ArticleAJP reports2017
Validation of a Prediction Model for Vaginal Birth after Cesarean Delivery Reveals Unexpected Success in a Diverse American Population.
Article in AJP reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 38 citations in OpenAlex.
- Factors associated with successful vaginal birth after a cesarean section: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2019Pooled it
- Prevalence of successful vaginal birth after caesarean section and its associated factors among women delivered in the university of Gondar comprehensive specialized referral hospital, Northwest Ethiopia.Contraception and reproductive medicine · 2025Article
- Validation of Grobman's graphical nomogram for prediction of vaginal delivery in Indian women with previous caesarean section.European journal of obstetrics & gynecology and reproductive biology: X · 2023Article
- A Prognostic Study for the Development of Risk Prediction Model for the Success of Vaginal Birth Following a Cesarean Surgery at Felege Hiwot Comprehensive Specialized Hospital, Northwest Ethiopia.Risk management and healthcare policy · 2023Article
- Trial of labor after two cesarean sections: A retrospective case-control study.The journal of obstetrics and gynaecology research · 2022Article
- Risk factor analysis in women who underwent trial of labor after cesarean section: a multicenter study in GermanyJournal of the Turkish German Gynecological Association · 2022Article
- Applying a Prediction Model for Vaginal Birth after Cesarean to a Latina Inner-City Population.AJP reports · 2020Article
- Validation of a Vaginal Birth after Cesarean Delivery Prediction Model in Teaching Hospitals of Addis Ababa University: A Cross-Sectional Study.BioMed research international · 2020Article
- Article
- Impact of obesity class on trial of labor after cesarean success: does pre-pregnancy or at-delivery obesity status matter?Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2019Article
- Success of trial of labor in women with a history of previous cesarean section for failed labor induction or labor dystocia: a retrospective cohort study.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2019Article
- Article
- Examining the Impact of the Vaginal Birth After Cesarean Risk Calculator Estimation on Trial of Labor After Cesarean Counseling.MDM policy & practiceArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.