ArticleESMO open2016
Reply to Early colon cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up.
Article in ESMO open, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Modified Triple Stapler Technique for Colorectal and Coloanal Anastomosis: A Retrospective Study of 132 Patients.Cureus · 2025Article
- Is robotic right colectomy economically sustainable? a multicentre retrospective comparative study and cost analysis.Surgical endoscopy · 2020Article
- Laparoscopic resection with complete mesocolic excision for splenic flexure cancer: long-term follow-up data from a multicenter retrospective study.Surgical endoscopy · 2020Article
- Does a 3D laparoscopic approach improve surgical outcome of mininvasive right colectomy? A retrospective case-control study.Updates in surgery · 2020Article
- Predictive factors for anastomotic leakage after laparoscopic colorectal surgery.World journal of gastroenterology · 2018Review
- Cost-effectiveness analysis of colorectal cancer screening in a low incidence country: The case of Saudi Arabia.Saudi journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Saudi Gastroenterology AssociationArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.