Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28255370›Full record

ReviewJournal of medicine and life

Erectile dysfunction post-radical prostatectomy - a challenge for both patient and physician.

O Bratu, I Oprea, D Marcu, D Spinu, A Niculae, B Geavlete, D Mischianu

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of medicine and life. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 60 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Research Advances in Stem Cell Therapy for Erectile Dysfunction.BioDrugs : clinical immunotherapeutics, biopharmaceuticals and gene therapy · 2024
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Anxiety, depression, urinary continence, and sexuality in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy: preliminary findings.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

O BratuDepartment of Urology, "Dr. Carol Davila" Central Military Universitary Emergency Hospital, Bucharest, Romania ; Clinical Department No. 3, "Carol Davila" University of Medicine and Pharmacy Bucharest, Romania.
I OpreaIntensive Care Unit, "Dr. Carol Davila" Central Military Universitary Emergency Hospital Bucharest, Romania.
D MarcuDepartment of Urology, "Dr. Carol Davila" Central Military Universitary Emergency Hospital, Bucharest, Romania.
D SpinuDepartment of Urology, "Dr. Carol Davila" Central Military Universitary Emergency Hospital, Bucharest, Romania ; Clinical Department No. 3, "Carol Davila" University of Medicine and Pharmacy Bucharest, Romania.
A NiculaeClinical Department No. 3, "Carol Davila" University of Medicine and Pharmacy Bucharest, Romania ; Department of Nephrology and Dialysis, "Sf. Ioan" Clinical Emergency Hospital Bucharest, Romania.
B GeavleteClinical Department No. 3, "Carol Davila" University of Medicine and Pharmacy Bucharest, Romania ; Department of Urology, "Sf. Ioan" Clinical Emergency Hospital Bucharest, Romania.
D MischianuDepartment of Urology, "Dr. Carol Davila" Central Military Universitary Emergency Hospital, Bucharest, Romania ; Clinical Department No. 3, "Carol Davila" University of Medicine and Pharmacy Bucharest, Romania.
Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy · ROEmergency University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Post-radical prostatectomy erectile dysfunction (post RP ED) is a major postoperative complication with a great impact on the quality of life of the patients. Until present, no proper algorithm or guideline based on the clinical trials has been established for the management of post RP ED. According to literature, it is better to initiate a penile rehabilitation program as soon as possible after surgery than doing nothing, in order to prevent and limit the postoperative local hypoxygenation and fibrosis. The results of numerous clinical trials regarding the effectiveness of the phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitors therapy on post RP ED have made them the gold standard treatment. Encouraging results have been achieved in studies with vacuum erectile devices, intraurethral suppositories with alprostadil and intracavernosal injections, but due to their side effects, especially in the cases of intracavernosal injections and intraurethral suppositories, their clinical use was limited therefore making them a second line option for the post RP ED treatment. What should not be forgotten is that penile implant prosthesis has proven very effective, numerous studies confirming high rates of satisfaction for both patients and partners.

Indexed as

PhysiciansAlprostadilErectile DysfunctionHumansMalePenile ProsthesisPhosphodiesterase 5 InhibitorsProstatectomyAlprostadilPhosphodiesterase 5 Inhibitorserectile dysfunctionintraurethral suppositoriespenile implant prosthesisphosphodiesterase 5 inhibitorsvacuum erectile devices

Identifiers

PMID28255370
PMCPMC5304365
OpenAlexW2594257294

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.