Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28255221›Full record

ArticleProceedings. IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition2016

Latent Variable Graphical Model Selection using Harmonic Analysis: Applications to the Human Connectome Project (HCP).

Won Hwa Kim, Hyunwoo J Kim, Nagesh Adluru, Vikas Singh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings. IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. The Incremental Multiresolution Matrix Factorization Algorithm.Proceedings. IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition · 2017
    Article
  2. Adaptive Signal Recovery on Graphs via Harmonic Analysis for Experimental Design in Neuroimaging.Computer vision - ECCV ... : ... European Conference on Computer Vision : proceedings. European Conference on Computer Vision · 2016
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Won Hwa KimDept. of Computer Sciences, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, U.S.A.
Hyunwoo J KimDept. of Computer Sciences, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, U.S.A.
Nagesh AdluruWaisman Center, Madison, WI, U.S.A.
Vikas SinghDept. of Computer Sciences, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, U.S.A; Dept. of Biostatistics & Med. Informatics, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, U.S.A.

Funding

Mapping the Human Connectome: Structure, Function, and HeritabilityU54MH091657 · NIMH · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI UGURBIL, KAMIL, VAN ESSEN, DAVID C · 2010 to 2014
$34.7M
INSTITUTIONAL CTSA (UW-MADISON): CLINICAL TRIALSUL1RR025011 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI DREZNER, MARC KENNETH · 2007 to 2011
$29.5M
WISCONSIN CENTER ON MENTAL RETARDATION: CORE SUPPORTP30HD003352 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI MAILICK, MARSHA RUTH · 1985 to 2015
$25.2M
Wisconsin Alzheimer's Disease Research CenterP50AG033514 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI CHAPPELL, RICHARD J · 2009 to 2018
$16.2M
TrainingU54AI117924 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI CRAVEN, MARK W. · 2014 to 2018
$11.3M
Institutional Clinical and Translational Science Award (UW-Madison)KL2RR025012 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI DREZNER, MARC KENNETH · 2007 to 2011
$11.1M
Institutional Clinical and Translational Science AwardKL2TR000428 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI DREZNER, MARC KENNETH · 2012 to 2016
$6.2M
Maximizing Power in AD Clinical Trials via Multimodal Machine LearningR01AG040396 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI SINGH, VIKAS · 2012 to 2015
$1.1M
AD classification algorithms using ADNI multi-modal image dataR21AG034315 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI SINGH, VIKAS · 2009 to 2010
$287k
NCATS NIH HHS KL2 TR000428NCRR NIH HHS KL2 RR025012NCRR NIH HHS UL1 RR025011NIAID NIH HHS U54 AI117924NIA NIH HHS P50 AG033514NIA NIH HHS R01 AG040396NIA NIH HHS R21 AG034315NICHD NIH HHS P30 HD003352NIMH NIH HHS U54 MH091657
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A major goal of imaging studies such as the (ongoing) Human Connectome Project (HCP) is to characterize the structural network map of the human brain and identify its associations with covariates such as genotype, risk factors, and so on that correspond to an individual. But the set of image derived measures and the set of covariates are both large, so we must first estimate a 'parsimonious' set of relations between the measurements. For instance, a Gaussian graphical model will show conditional independences between the random variables, which can then be used to setup specific downstream analyses. But most such data involve a large list of 'latent' variables that remain unobserved, yet affect the 'observed' variables sustantially. Accounting for such latent variables is not directly addressed by standard precision matrix estimation, and is tackled via highly specialized optimization methods. This paper offers a unique harmonic analysis view of this problem. By casting the estimation of the precision matrix in terms of a composition of low-frequency latent variables and high-frequency sparse terms, we show how the problem can be formulated using a new wavelet-type expansion in non-Euclidean spaces. Our formulation poses the estimation problem in the frequency space and shows how it can be solved by a simple sub-gradient scheme. We provide a set of scientific results on ~500 scans from the recently released HCP data where our algorithm recovers highly interpretable and sparse conditional dependencies between brain connectivity pathways and well-known covariates.

Identifiers

PMID28255221
PMCPMC5330303

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.