Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28255181›Full record

ArticleInsectes sociaux2017

The effects of disturbance threat on leaf-cutting ant colonies: a laboratory study.

V C Norman, T Pamminger, W O H Hughes

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Insectes sociaux, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

V C NormanSchool of Life Sciences, University of Sussex, Brighton, East Sussex BN1 9QG UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5746-1137
T PammingerSchool of Life Sciences, University of Sussex, Brighton, East Sussex BN1 9QG UK.
W O H HughesSchool of Life Sciences, University of Sussex, Brighton, East Sussex BN1 9QG UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The flexibility of organisms to respond plastically to their environment is fundamental to their fitness and evolutionary success. Social insects provide some of the most impressive examples of plasticity, with individuals exhibiting behavioral and sometimes morphological adaptations for their specific roles in the colony, such as large soldiers for nest defense. However, with the exception of the honey bee model organism, there has been little investigation of the nature and effects of environmental stimuli thought to instigate alternative phenotypes in social insects. Here, we investigate the effect of repeated threat disturbance over a prolonged (17 month) period on both behavioral and morphological phenotypes, using phenotypically plastic leaf-cutting ants (

Indexed as

Animal behaviorAnimal personalityBehavioral syndromesCastesDivision of laborPhenotypic plasticitySocial insect

Identifiers

PMID28255181
PMCPMC5310565

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.