ReviewJournal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine2017
Qualification of National Cancer Institute-Designated Cancer Centers for Quantitative PET/CT Imaging in Clinical Trials.
Review in Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- EA1211: interim FDG-PET/CT for predicting response of HER2-positive breast cancer to neoadjuvant therapy (DIRECT trial).Future oncology (London, England) · 2025Trial
- Standardized Uptake Value Using Thyroid Quantitative SPECT/CT for the Diagnosis and Evaluation of Graves' Disease: A Prospective Multicenter Study.BioMed research international · 2019Trial
- Quality improvements in radiation oncology clinical trials.Frontiers in oncology · 2023Review
- Understanding the importance of quality control and quality assurance in preclinical PET/CT imaging.EJNMMI physics · 2022Article
- Article
- Evaluation of PET quantitation accuracy among multiple discovery IQ PET/CT systems via NEMA image quality test.EJNMMI physics · 2020Article
- Bias in PET Images of Solid Phantoms Due to CT-Based Attenuation Correction.Tomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.) · 2019Article
- The Use of Quantitative Imaging in Radiation Oncology: A Quantitative Imaging Network (QIN) Perspective.International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics · 2018Review
- Standard OSEM vs. regularized PET image reconstruction: qualitative and quantitative comparison using phantom data and various clinical radiopharmaceuticals.American journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2018Article
- Measuring temporal stability of positron emission tomography standardized uptake value bias using long-lived sources in a multicenter network.Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.) · 2018Article
- Multicenter survey of PET/CT protocol parameters that affect standardized uptake values.Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.) · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The National Cancer Institute developed the Centers for Quantitative Imaging Excellence (CQIE) initiative in 2010 to prequalify imaging facilities at all of the National Cancer Institute-designated comprehensive and clinical cancer centers for oncology trials using advanced imaging techniques, including PET. Here we review the CQIE PET/CT scanner qualification process and results in detail.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.