ArticleJournal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine2017
Arterial CO
Article in Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Brain‑heart axis: Neurostimulation techniques in ischemic heart disease (Review).International journal of molecular medicine · 2025Review
- Vasoactive breathing manoeuvres as an effective coronary vasodilator in patients with suspected coronary artery disease: a prospective comparative oxygenation-sensitive CMR study.European heart journal. Imaging methods and practice · 2025Article
- Hypercapnia in COPD: Causes, Consequences, and Therapy.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Review
- Emerging MRI techniques for molecular and functional phenotyping of the diseased heart.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2022Review
- Blood Oxygen Level-Dependent MRI of the Myocardium with Multiecho Gradient-Echo Spin-Echo Imaging.Radiology · 2020Article
- Caffeine Modulates Spontaneous Adenosine and Oxygen Changes during Ischemia and Reperfusion.ACS chemical neuroscience · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
22 authors at 7 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Myocardial blood flow (MBF) is the critical determinant of cardiac function. However, its response to increases in partial pressure of arterial CO
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.