Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28254733›Full record

ArticleJMIR research protocols2017

Bioengineered Temporomandibular Joint Disk Implants: Study Protocol for a Two-Phase Exploratory Randomized Preclinical Pilot Trial in 18 Black Merino Sheep (TEMPOJIMS).

David Faustino Ângelo, Florencio Gil Monje, Raúl González-García, Christopher B Little, Lisete Mónico, Mário Pinho, Fábio Abade Santos, Belmira Carrapiço, Sandra Cavaco Gonçalves, Pedro Morouço and 9 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR research protocols, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 7 institutions in 4 countries.

David Faustino ÂngeloCentro Hospitalar de Setúbal, EPE, Stomatology Department, Setúbal, Portugal.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8411-9946
Florencio Gil MonjeUniversity Hospital Infanta Cristina, Badajoz, Spain, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Badajoz, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0184-3758
Raúl González-GarcíaUniversity Hospital Infanta Cristina, Badajoz, Spain, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Badajoz, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4801-8712
Christopher B LittleKolling Institute, Institute of Bone and Joint Research, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0353-7634
Lisete MónicoCoimbra University, Coimbra, Portugal.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9374-2702
Mário PinhoFaculdade de Medicina Veterinaria, Interdisciplinary Centre of Research in Animal Health (CIISA), Lisbon University, Lisboa, Portugal.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4502-667X
Fábio Abade SantosFaculdade de Medicina Veterinaria, Interdisciplinary Centre of Research in Animal Health (CIISA), Lisbon University, Lisboa, Portugal.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0696-7322
Belmira CarrapiçoFaculdade de Medicina Veterinaria, Lisbon University, Lisboa, Portugal.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1936-5697
Sandra Cavaco GonçalvesInstituto Nacional de Investigação Agrária e Veterinária (INIAV I.P.), Santarém, Portugal.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1280-229X
Pedro MorouçoInstituto Politécnico de Leiria, Centre for Rapid and Sustainable Product Development (CDRSP), Leiria, Portugal.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5956-9790
Nuno AlvesInstituto Politécnico de Leiria, Centre for Rapid and Sustainable Product Development (CDRSP), Leiria, Portugal.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5016-0868
Carla MouraInstituto Politécnico de Leiria, Centre for Rapid and Sustainable Product Development (CDRSP), Leiria, Portugal.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0998-5929
Yadong WangUniversity of Pittsburgh, Chemical Engineering and Surgery Pittsburgh, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2067-382X
Eric JeffriesUniversity of Pittsburgh, Chemical Engineering and Surgery Pittsburgh, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8491-8596
Jin GaoUniversity of Pittsburgh, Chemical Engineering and Surgery Pittsburgh, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6200-4141
Rita SousaFaculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6096-8182
Lia Lucas NetoFaculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7880-9625
Daniel CaldeiraFaculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2520-5673
Francisco SalvadoFaculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1095-8090
University of Lisbon · PTInstituto Politécnico de Leiria · PTUniversity of Pittsburgh · USHospital Universitario Infanta Cristina · ESInstituto Nacional de Investigação Agrária e Veterinária · PTThe University of Sydney · AUUniversity of Coimbra · PT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPreclinical trials are essential to test efficacious options to substitute the temporomandibular joint (TMJ) disk. The contemporary absence of an ideal treatment for patients with severe TMJ disorders can be related to difficulties concerning the appropriate study design to conduct preclinical trials in the TMJ field. These difficulties can be associated with the use of heterogeneous animal models, the use of the contralateral TMJ as control, the absence of rigorous randomized controlled preclinical trials with blinded outcomes assessors, and difficulties involving multidisciplinary teams.

objectiveThis study aims to develop a new, reproducible, and effective study design for preclinical research in the TMJ domain, obtaining rigorous data related to (1) identify the impact of bilateral discectomy in black Merino sheep, (2) identify the impact of bilateral discopexy in black Merino sheep, and (3) identify the impact of three different bioengineering TMJ discs in black Merino sheep.

methodsA two-phase exploratory randomized controlled preclinical trial with blinded outcomes is proposed. In the first phase, nine sheep are randomized into three different surgical bilateral procedures: bilateral discectomy, bilateral discopexy, and sham surgery. In the second phase, nine sheep are randomized to bilaterally test three different TMJ bioengineering disk implants. The primary outcome is the histological gradation of TMJ. Secondary outcomes are imaging changes, absolute masticatory time, ruminant time per cycle, ruminant kinetics, ruminant area, and sheep weight.

resultsPrevious preclinical studies in this field have used the contralateral unoperated side as a control, different animal models ranging from mice to a canine model, with nonrandomized, nonblinded and uncontrolled study designs and limited outcomes measures. The main goal of this exploratory preclinical protocol is to set a new standard for future preclinical trials in oromaxillofacial surgery, particularly in the TMJ field, by proposing a rigorous design in black Merino sheep. The authors also intend to test the feasibility of pilot outcomes. The authors expect to increase the quality of further studies in this field and to progress in future treatment options for patients undergoing surgery for TMJ disk replacement.

conclusionsThe study has commenced, but it is too early to provide results or conclusions.

Indexed as

temporomandibular joint bioengineered disk implantstemporomandibular joint disorders (TMD)temporomandibular randomized preclinical trial protocol

Identifiers

PMID28254733
PMCPMC5355627
OpenAlexW2593673746

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.