Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28253882›Full record

Trial reportBMC medical ethics2017

Principle-based structured case discussions: do they foster moral competence in medical students? - A pilot study.

Orsolya Friedrich, Kay Hemmerling, Katja Kuehlmeyer, Stefanie Nörtemann, Martin Fischer, Georg Marckmann

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC medical ethics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Constructing knowledge and moral skills through hospital clown interventions: a qualitative study.International journal of qualitative studies on health and well-being · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Orsolya FriedrichInstitute for Ethics, History and Theory of Medicine at Ludwig Maximilian University (LMU), Lessingstr. 2, 80336, Munich, Germany. orsolya.friedrich@lrz.uni-muenchen.de.ORCID 0000-0003-1608-175X
Kay HemmerlingInstitute for Pedagogic and Rehabilitation Psychology at the University of Leipzig, Neumarkt 9-19, 04109, Leipzig, Germany.
Katja KuehlmeyerInstitute for Ethics, History and Theory of Medicine at Ludwig Maximilian University (LMU), Lessingstr. 2, 80336, Munich, Germany.
Stefanie NörtemannInstitute for Ethics, History and Theory of Medicine at Ludwig Maximilian University (LMU), Lessingstr. 2, 80336, Munich, Germany.
Martin FischerInstitute for Medical Education at the University Hospital of LMU Munich, Lessingstr. 2, 80336, Munich, Germany.
Georg MarckmannInstitute for Ethics, History and Theory of Medicine at Ludwig Maximilian University (LMU), Lessingstr. 2, 80336, Munich, Germany.
Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München · DELeipzig University · DELMU Klinikum · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRecent findings suggest that medical students' moral competence decreases throughout medical school. This pilot study gives preliminary insights into the effects of two educational interventions in ethics classes on moral competence among medical students in Munich, Germany.

methodsBetween 2012 and 2013, medical students were tested using Lind's Moral Competence Test (MCT) prior to and after completing different ethics classes. The experimental group (EG, N = 76) participated in principle-based structured case discussions (PBSCDs) and was compared with a control group with theory-based case discussions (TBCDs) (CG, N = 55). The pre/post C-scores were compared using a Wilcoxon Test, ANOVA and effect-size calculation.

resultsThe C-score improved by around 3.2 C-points in the EG, and by 0.2 C-points in the CG. The mean C-score difference was not statistically significant for the EG (P = 0.14) or between the two groups (P = 0.34). There was no statistical significance for the teachers' influence (P = 0.54) on C-score. In both groups, students with below-average (M = 29.1) C-scores improved and students with above-average C-scores regressed. The increase of the C-Index was greater in the EG than in the CG. The absolute effect-size of the EG compared with the CG was 3.0 C-points, indicating a relevant effect.

conclusionTeaching ethics with PBSCDs did not provide a statistically significant influence on students' moral competence, compared with TBCDs. Yet, the effect size suggests that PBSCDs may improve moral competence among medical students more effectively. Further research with larger and completely randomized samples is needed to gain definite explanations for the results.

Indexed as

Education, Medical, UndergraduateMoral DevelopmentPrinciple-Based EthicsProblem-Based LearningProfessional CompetenceStudents, MedicalAdultCurriculumEducational MeasurementEthical TheoryEthics, MedicalFemaleGermanyHumansMaleMoralsEducational interventionMedical ethics classMedical studentsMoral competenceMoral competence test

Identifiers

PMID28253882
PMCPMC5335793
OpenAlexW2594114428

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.