Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28253879›Full record

ArticleBMC psychiatry2017

Seeking help in times of economic hardship: access, experiences of services and unmet need.

M C Barnes, J L Donovan, C Wilson, J Chatwin, R Davies, J Potokar, N Kapur, K Hawton, R O'Connor, D Gunnell

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC psychiatry, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. The Global Polycrisis and Health Inequalities.International journal of social determinants of health and health services · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Local Inequalities in Health Behaviours: Longitudinal Findings from the Stockton-On-Tees Cohort Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

M C BarnesSchool of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, BS8 2PS, UK. maria.barnes@bristol.ac.uk.
J L DonovanSchool of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, BS8 2PS, UK.
C WilsonSchool of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, BS8 2PS, UK.
J ChatwinUniversity of Salford, Salford, UK.
R DaviesSchool of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, BS8 2PS, UK.
J PotokarSchool of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, BS8 2PS, UK.
N KapurCentre for Suicide Prevention, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
K HawtonCentre for Suicide Research, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
R O'ConnorSuicidal Behaviour Research Laboratory, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
D GunnellSchool of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, BS8 2PS, UK.

Funding

Department of Health RP-PG-0610-10026
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEconomic recessions are often accompanied by increased levels of psychological distress and suicidal behaviour in affected populations. Little is known about the experiences of people seeking help for employment, financial and benefit-related difficulties during recessions. We investigated the experiences of people struggling financially in the aftermath of the Great Recession (2008-9) - including some who had self-harmed - and of the frontline support staff providing assistance.

methodsInterviews were conducted with three groups of people in two cities: i) people who had self-harmed due to employment, financial or benefit concerns (n = 19) ('self-harm'); ii) people who were struggling financially drawn from the community (n = 22), including one focus group) ('community'); iii) and frontline staff from voluntary and statutory sector organisations (e.g., Job Centres, Debt Advice and counselling agencies) providing support services to the groups (n = 25, including 2 focus groups) ('service providers'). Data were analysed using the constant comparison method.

resultsService provision was described by people as confusing and difficult to access. The community sample reported considerably more knowledge and access to debt advice than the participants who had self-harmed - although both groups sought similar types of help. The self-harm group exhibited greater expectation that they should be self-reliant and also reported lower levels of informal networks and support from friends and relatives. They had also experienced more difficult circumstances such as benefit sanctions, and most had pre-existing mental health problems. Both self-harm and community groups indicated that practical help for debt and benefit issues would be the most useful - a view supported by service providers - and would have particularly helped those who self-harmed.

conclusionInterventions to identify those in need and aid them to access practical, reliable and free advice from support agencies could help mitigate the impact on mental health of benefit, debt and employment difficulties for vulnerable sections of society.

Indexed as

Economic RecessionAdultCounselingEmploymentEnglandFemaleFocus GroupsHealth Services Needs and DemandHumansMaleMental HealthMental Health ServicesMiddle AgedPovertySelf-Injurious BehaviorYoung AdultExperiencesHelp-seekingMental healthNeedQualitativeRecessionSelf-harmServices

Identifiers

PMID28253879
PMCPMC5335839

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.