Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28253541›Full record

ReviewGenesis (New York, N.Y. : 2000)2017

Should I stay or should I go? Cadherin function and regulation in the neural crest.

Lisa A Taneyhill, Andrew T Schiffmacher

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Genesis (New York, N.Y. : 2000), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 61 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. A thermodynamic perspective on mammalian neural crest ingression.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. mEpigenetics · 2022
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Dormancy: There and Back Again.Molecular biology · 2022
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Otic Neurogenesis inFrontiers in neuroanatomy · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Lisa A TaneyhillDepartment of Animal and Avian Sciences, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland, 20742.ORCID 0000-0002-8630-2514
Andrew T SchiffmacherDepartment of Animal and Avian Sciences, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland, 20742.
University of Maryland, College Park · US

Funding

Neural crest and placode cell interactions during cranial gangliogenesisR01DE024217 · NIDCR · UNIV OF MARYLAND, COLLEGE PARK · PI TANEYHILL, LISA A · 2014 to 2018
$1.9M
NIDCR NIH HHS R01 DE024217
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Our increasing comprehension of neural crest cell development has reciprocally advanced our understanding of cadherin expression, regulation, and function. As a transient population of multipotent stem cells that significantly contribute to the vertebrate body plan, neural crest cells undergo a variety of transformative processes and exhibit many cellular behaviors, including epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT), motility, collective cell migration, and differentiation. Multiple studies have elucidated regulatory and mechanistic details of specific cadherins during neural crest cell development in a highly contextual manner. Collectively, these results reveal that gradual changes within neural crest cells are accompanied by often times subtle, yet important, alterations in cadherin expression and function. The primary focus of this review is to coalesce recent data on cadherins in neural crest cells, from their specification to their emergence as motile cells soon after EMT, and to highlight the complexities of cadherin expression beyond our current perceptions, including the hypothesis that the neural crest EMT is a transition involving a predominantly singular cadherin switch. Further advancements in genetic approaches and molecular techniques will provide greater opportunities to integrate data from various model systems in order to distinguish unique or overlapping functions of cadherins expressed at any point throughout the ontogeny of the neural crest.

Indexed as

Gene Expression Regulation, DevelopmentalAnimalsCadherinsHumansNeural CrestProtein Processing, Post-TranslationalTranscriptional ActivationCadherinsearly developmentmigrationneural crestpatterningprocesstissue

Identifiers

PMID28253541
PMCPMC5468476
OpenAlexW2591765579

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.