Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28253390›Full record

Trial reportJAMA oncology2017

Adjuvant Capecitabine in Combination With Docetaxel, Epirubicin, and Cyclophosphamide for Early Breast Cancer: The Randomized Clinical FinXX Trial.

Heikki Joensuu, Pirkko-Liisa Kellokumpu-Lehtinen, Riikka Huovinen, Arja Jukkola-Vuorinen, Minna Tanner, Riitta Kokko, Johan Ahlgren, Päivi Auvinen, Outi Lahdenperä, Sanna Kosonen and 8 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in JAMA oncology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00114816 (A Randomized Phase III Study Comparing Docetaxel Followed by Cyclophosphamide, Epirubicin and 5-FU to Docetaxel With Capecitabine Followed by Cyclophosphamide, Epirubicin and Capecitabine as Adjuvant Treatment for Early Breast Cancer), which is not on this map. Cited by 48 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
48citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00114816 phase3completednot on this map

A Randomized Phase III Study Comparing Docetaxel Followed by Cyclophosphamide, Epirubicin and 5-FU to Docetaxel With Capecitabine Followed by Cyclophosphamide, Epirubicin and Capecitabine as Adjuvant Treatment for Early Breast Cancer

TypeinterventionalSponsorFinnish Breast Cancer GroupRan2004 to 2007Enrolled1,500ConditionsBreast CancerArmscapecitabine, docetaxel
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

48 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 94 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. FOXC1 Expression Predicts Capecitabine Efficacy in Patients with Triple-Negative Breast Cancer from the GEICAM_CIBOMA Trial.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2025
    Trial
  9. Triple-Negative PAM50 Non-Basal Breast Cancer Subtype Predicts Benefit from Extended Adjuvant Capecitabine.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2023
    Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Adjuvant Capecitabine for Early Breast Cancer: 15-Year Overall Survival Results From a Randomized Trial.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2022
    Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 12 institutions in 2 countries.

Heikki JoensuuDepartment of Oncology, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Pirkko-Liisa Kellokumpu-LehtinenDepartment of Oncology, Tampere University Hospital and University of Tampere, Tampere, Finland.
Riikka HuovinenDepartment of Oncology, Turku University Central Hospital, Turku, Finland.
Arja Jukkola-VuorinenDepartment of Oncology and Radiotherapy, Oulu University Hospital, Oulu, Finland.
Minna TannerDepartment of Oncology, Tampere University Hospital and University of Tampere, Tampere, Finland.
Riitta KokkoKanta-Häme Central Hospital, Hämeenlinna, Finland.
Johan AhlgrenGävle Hospital, Gävle, Sweden.
Päivi AuvinenCancer Center, Kuopio University Hospital, Kuopio, Finland.
Outi LahdenperäDepartment of Oncology, Turku University Central Hospital, Turku, Finland.
Sanna KosonenKotka Central Hospital, Kotka, Finland.
Kenneth VillmanÖrebro University Hospital, Örebro, Sweden.
Paul NyandotoPäijät-Häme Central Hospital, Lahti, Finland.
Greger NilssonUppsala University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden.
Paula Poikonen-SakselaDepartment of Oncology, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Vesa KatajaCancer Center, Kuopio University Hospital, Kuopio, Finland12Vaasa Central Hospital, Vaasa, Finland.
Jouni Junnila4Pharma, Turku, Finland.
Petri BonoDepartment of Oncology, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Henrik LindmanUppsala University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden.
Helsinki University Hospital · FIKuopio University Hospital · FITampere University Hospital · FITurku University Hospital · FIUppsala University Hospital · SEGävle Hospital · SEKanta-Hämeen Keskussairaala · FIKotka Maritime Research Centre · FIÖrebro University Hospital · SEOulu University Hospital · FIPäijät-Hämeen Keskussairaala · FIUniversity of Helsinki · FI

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

importanceCapecitabine is not considered a standard agent in the adjuvant treatment of early breast cancer. The results of this study suggest that addition of adjuvant capecitabine to a regimen that contains docetaxel, epirubicin, and cyclophosphamide improves survival outcomes of patients with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC).

objectiveTo investigate the effect of capecitabine on long-term survival outcomes of patients with early breast cancer, particularly in subgroups defined by cancer estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PR) content, and HER2 content (human epidermal growth factor receptor 2). DESIGN, SETTING, AND

participantsThis is an exploratory analysis of the multicenter FinXX randomized clinical trial that accrued 1500 women in Finland and Sweden between January 27, 2004, and May 29, 2007. About half received 3 cycles of docetaxel followed by 3 cycles of cyclophosphamide, epirubicin, and fluorouracil (T+CEF), while the other half received 3 cycles of docetaxel plus capecitabine followed by 3 cycles of cyclophosphamide, epirubicin, and capecitabine (TX+CEX). Data analysis took place between January 27, 2004, and December 31, 2015. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Recurrence-free survival (RFS).

resultsFollowing random allocation, 747 women received T+CEF, and 753 women received TX+CEX. Five patients were excluded from the intention-to-treat population (3 had overt distant metastases at the time of randomization; 2 withdrew consent). The median age of the remaining 1495 patients was 53 years at the time of study entry; 157 (11%) had axillary node-negative disease; 1142 (76%) had ER-positive cancer; and 282 (19%) had HER2-positive cancer. The median follow-up time after random allocation was 10.3 years. There was no significant difference in RFS or overall survival between the groups (hazard ratio [HR], 0.88; 95% CI, 0.71-1.08; P = .23; and HR, 0.84, 95% CI, 0.66-1.07; P = .15; respectively). Breast cancer-specific survival tended to favor the capecitabine group (HR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.60-1.04; P = .10). When RFS and survival of the patients were compared within the subgroups defined by cancer steroid hormone receptor status (ER and/or PR positive vs ER and PR negative) and HER2 status (positive vs negative), TX+CEX was more effective than T+CEF in the subset of patients with TNBC (HR, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.31-0.92; P = .02; and HR, 0.55, 95% CI, 0.31-0.96; P = .03; respectively). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Capecitabine administration with docetaxel, epirubicin, and cyclophosphamide did not prolong RFS or survival compared with a regimen that contained only standard agents. Patients with TNBC had favorable survival outcomes when treated with the capecitabine-containing regimen in an exploratory subgroup analysis.

trial registrationclinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00114816.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsCapecitabineChemotherapy, AdjuvantCyclophosphamideDocetaxelEpirubicinFemaleFinlandFluorouracilHumansMiddle AgedReceptors, EstrogenReceptors, ProgesteroneCapecitabineCyclophosphamideDocetaxelEpirubicinFluorouracilReceptors, EstrogenReceptors, ProgesteroneTaxoids

Identifiers

PMID28253390
PMCPMC5824321
OpenAlexW2591793336

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.