Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28253366›Full record

ArticlePloS one2017

Fetal growth trajectories in pregnancies of European and South Asian mothers with and without gestational diabetes, a population-based cohort study.

Line Sletner, Anne Karen Jenum, Chittaranjan S Yajnik, Kjersti Mørkrid, Britt Nakstad, Odd Harald Rognerud-Jensen, Kåre I Birkeland, Siri Vangen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Effect of Gestational Diabetes on Fetal Growth Rate and Later Overweight in the Offspring.The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism · 2025
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Risk Prediction Model of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus in a Chinese Population Based on a Risk Scoring System.Diabetes therapy : research, treatment and education of diabetes and related disorders · 2021
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Line SletnerDept. of Pediatric and Adolescents Medicine, Akershus University Hospital, Lørenskog, Norway.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5085-7366
Anne Karen JenumDept. of General Practice, Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Chittaranjan S YajnikDiabetes Unit, King Edward Memorial Hospital Research Centre, Pune, India.
Kjersti MørkridDept. of International Public Health, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway.
Britt NakstadDept. of Pediatric and Adolescents Medicine, Akershus University Hospital, Lørenskog, Norway.
Odd Harald Rognerud-JensenFaculty of Health, Oslo and Akershus University College of Applied Sciences, Oslo, Norway.
Kåre I BirkelandDepartment of Endocrinology, Morbid Obesity and Preventive Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Siri VangenNorwegian National Advisory Unit on Women`s Health, Department for Woman and Child Health, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Oslo University Hospital · NOUniversity of Oslo · NOAkershus University Hospital · NOKing Edward Memorial Hospital Research Centre · INNorwegian Institute of Public Health · NOOsloMet – Oslo Metropolitan University · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveOur aim was to examine the impact of gestational diabetes (GDM), from before the GDM-diagnosis is made, on fetal growth trajectories, and to compare it in Europeans and South Asians; two ethnic groups with dissimilar fetal growth patterns.

methodsWe studied European (n = 349) and South Asian (n = 184) pregnant women, from the population-based STORK-Groruddalen cohort in Oslo, Norway. Mothers were enrolled in early pregnancy, screened for GDM in gestational week 28 ±2, and classified as "non-GDM", "mild GDM" or "moderate/severe GDM". We measured fetal head circumference, abdominal circumference and femur length by ultrasound, and estimated fetal weight in gestational week 24, 32 and 37, and performed corresponding measurements at birth.

resultsIn non-GDM pregnancies, South Asian fetuses (n = 156) had a slower growth from gestational week 24, compared with Europeans (n = 310). More than two thirds of the European mothers later diagnosed with GDM were overweight or obese in early pregnancy, while this was not observed in South Asians. Fetuses of GDM mothers tended to be smaller than fetuses of non-GDM mothers in week 24, but thereafter grew faster until birth. This pattern was especially pronounced in fetuses of South Asian mothers with moderate/severe GDM. In week 24 these fetuses had a -0.95 SD (95% CI: -1.53, -0.36) lower estimated fetal weight than their non-GDM counterparts. In contrast, at birth they were 0.45 SD (0.09, 0.81) larger.

conclusionsOffspring of GDM mothers were smaller in mid pregnancy, but subsequently grew faster until birth, compared with offspring of non-GDM mothers. This pattern was most prominent in South Asian mothers with moderate to severe GDM. However, the most remarkable characteristic of these fetuses was not a large size at birth, but the small size in mid pregnancy, before the GDM diagnosis was set.

Indexed as

Fetal DevelopmentAdultAnthropometryAsiaCohort StudiesDiabetes, GestationalEuropeFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornPregnancy

Identifiers

PMID28253366
PMCPMC5333847
OpenAlexW2594705970

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.