Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28253364›Full record

SynthesisPloS one2017

Comparison of 18F-FDG PET/CT and DWI for detection of mediastinal nodal metastasis in non-small cell lung cancer: A meta-analysis.

Guohua Shen, You Lan, Kan Zhang, Pengwei Ren, Zhiyun Jia

Expression of concernErratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract readComparative StudyMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It carries an expression of concern. Cited by 27 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Diagnostic potential of [Japanese journal of radiology · 2024
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Multidisciplinary Postoperative Validation ofJournal of clinical medicine · 2022
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Guohua ShenDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, People's Republic of China.
You LanDivision of Laboratory Medicine, West China School of Medicine, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, People's Republic of China.
Kan ZhangDivision of Laboratory Medicine, West China School of Medicine, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, People's Republic of China.
Pengwei RenDepartment of Evidence-Based Medicine and Clinical Epidemiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, People's Republic of China.
Zhiyun JiaDivision of Laboratory Medicine, West China School of Medicine, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, People's Republic of China.
Sichuan University · CNWest China Hospital of Sichuan University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAccurate clinical staging of mediastinal lymph nodes of patients with lung cancer is important in determining therapeutic options and prognoses. We aimed to compare the diagnostic performance of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DWI) and 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (18F-FDG PET/CT) in detecting mediastinal nodal metastasis of lung cancer.

methodsRelevant studies were systematically searched in the MEDLINE, EMBASE, PUBMED, and Cochrane Library databases. Based on extracted data, the pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative likelihood ratios (PLR and NLR) with individual 95% confidence intervals were calculated. In addition, the publication bias was assessed by Deek's funnel plot of the asymmetry test. The potential heterogeneity was explored by threshold effect analysis and subgroup analyses.

resultsForty-three studies were finally included. For PET/CT, the pooled sensitivity and specificity were 0.65 (0.63-0.67) and 0.93 (0.93-0.94), respectively. The corresponding values of DWI were 0.72 (0.68-0.76) and 0.97 (0.96-0.98), respectively. The overall PLR and NLR of DWI were 13.15 (5.98-28.89) and 0.32 (0.27-0.39), respectively. For PET/CT, the corresponding values were 8.46 (6.54-10.96) and 0.38 (0.33-0.45), respectively. The Deek's test revealed no significant publication bias. Study design and patient enrollment were potential causes for the heterogeneity of DWI studies and the threshold was a potential source for PET/CT studies.

conclusionBoth modalities are beneficial in detecting lymph nodes metastases in lung cancer without significant differences between them. DWI might be an alternative modality for evaluating nodal status of NSCLC.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungFluorodeoxyglucose F18HumansLung NeoplasmsLymphatic MetastasisMultimodal ImagingPositron-Emission TomographyTomography, X-Ray ComputedFluorodeoxyglucose F18

Identifiers

PMID28253364
PMCPMC5333854
OpenAlexW2594863112

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.