Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28253353›Full record

Observational studyPloS one2017

Effect of goal-directed therapy on outcome after esophageal surgery: A quality improvement study.

Denise P Veelo, Mark I van Berge Henegouwen, Kirsten S Ouwehand, Bart F Geerts, Maarten C J Anderegg, Susan van Dieren, Benedikt Preckel, Jan M Binnekade, Suzanne S Gisbertz, Markus W Hollmann

Open access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
9.2field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 64 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Anastomotic leakage after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: definitions, diagnostics, and treatment.Diseases of the esophagus : official journal of the International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus · 2021
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Denise P VeeloDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Mark I van Berge HenegouwenDepartment of Surgery, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Kirsten S OuwehandDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Bart F GeertsDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Maarten C J AndereggDepartment of Surgery, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Susan van DierenDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Benedikt PreckelDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Jan M BinnekadeDepartment of Intensive Care, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Suzanne S GisbertzDepartment of Surgery, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Markus W HollmannDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Academic Medical Center · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGoal-directed therapy (GDT) can reduce postoperative complications in high-risk surgery patients. It is uncertain whether GDT has the same benefits in patients undergoing esophageal surgery. Goal of this Quality Improvement study was to evaluate the effects of a stroke volume guided GDT on post-operative outcome. METHODS AND

findingsWe compared the postoperative outcome of patients undergoing esophagectomy before (99 patients) and after (100 patients) implementation of GDT. There was no difference in the proportion of patients with a complication (56% vs. 54%, p = 0.82), hospital stay and mortality. The incidence of prolonged ICU stay (>48 hours) was reduced (28% vs. 12, p = .005) in patients treated with GDT. Secondary analysis of complication rate showed a decrease in pneumonia (29 vs. 15%, p = .02), mediastinal abscesses (12 vs. 3%, p = .02), and gastric tube necrosis (5% vs. 0%, p = .03) in patients treated with GDT. Patients in the GDT group received significantly less fluids but received more colloids.

conclusionsThe implementation of GDT during esophagectomy was not associated with reductions in overall morbidity, mortality and hospital length of stay. However, we observed a decrease in pneumonia, mediastinal abscesses, gastric tube necrosis, and ICU length of stay.

Indexed as

GoalsQuality ImprovementAgedAnti-Infective AgentsEsophagectomyEsophagusFemaleGuideline AdherenceHumansLength of StayMaleMiddle AgedPostoperative ComplicationsAnti-Infective Agents

Identifiers

PMID28253353
PMCPMC5333843
OpenAlexW2594423773

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.