Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28253350›Full record

ArticlePloS one2017

Sox10 contributes to the balance of fate choice in dorsal root ganglion progenitors.

Mariana Delfino-Machín, Romain Madelaine, Giorgia Busolin, Masataka Nikaido, Sarah Colanesi, Karen Camargo-Sosa, Edward W P Law, Stefano Toppo, Patrick Blader, Natascia Tiso and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. [Mechanisms of enhanced noise susceptibility in waardenburg syndromeLin chuang er bi yan hou tou jing wai ke za zhi = Journal of clinical otorhinolaryngology head and neck surgery · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Neural crest development: insights from the zebrafish.Developmental dynamics : an official publication of the American Association of Anatomists · 2020
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Mariana Delfino-MachínDepartment of Biology and Biochemistry and Centre for Regenerative Medicine, University of Bath, Bath, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6080-7696
Romain MadelaineCentre de Biologie du Développement (CBD, UMR5547), Centre de Biologie Intégrative (CBI), Université de Toulouse, CNRS, UPS, Toulouse, France.
Giorgia BusolinDepartment of Biology, University of Padova, Padova, Italy.
Masataka NikaidoDepartment of Biology and Biochemistry and Centre for Regenerative Medicine, University of Bath, Bath, United Kingdom.
Sarah ColanesiDepartment of Biology and Biochemistry and Centre for Regenerative Medicine, University of Bath, Bath, United Kingdom.
Karen Camargo-SosaDepartment of Biology and Biochemistry and Centre for Regenerative Medicine, University of Bath, Bath, United Kingdom.
Edward W P LawDepartment of Biology and Biochemistry and Centre for Regenerative Medicine, University of Bath, Bath, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5089-6341
Stefano ToppoDepartment of Molecular Medicine, University of Padova, Padova, Italy.
Patrick BladerCentre de Biologie du Développement (CBD, UMR5547), Centre de Biologie Intégrative (CBI), Université de Toulouse, CNRS, UPS, Toulouse, France.
Natascia TisoDepartment of Biology, University of Padova, Padova, Italy.
Robert N KelshDepartment of Biology and Biochemistry and Centre for Regenerative Medicine, University of Bath, Bath, United Kingdom.
University of Bath · GBUniversity of Padua · ITCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FR

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/D000440/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The development of functional peripheral ganglia requires a balance of specification of both neuronal and glial components. In the developing dorsal root ganglia (DRGs), these components form from partially-restricted bipotent neuroglial precursors derived from the neural crest. Work in mouse and chick has identified several factors, including Delta/Notch signaling, required for specification of a balance of these components. We have previously shown in zebrafish that the Sry-related HMG domain transcription factor, Sox10, plays an unexpected, but crucial, role in sensory neuron fate specification in vivo. In the same study we described a novel Sox10 mutant allele, sox10baz1, in which sensory neuron numbers are elevated above those of wild-types. Here we investigate the origin of this neurogenic phenotype. We demonstrate that the supernumerary neurons are sensory neurons, and that enteric and sympathetic neurons are almost absent just as in classical sox10 null alleles; peripheral glial development is also severely abrogated in a manner similar to other sox10 mutant alleles. Examination of proliferation and apoptosis in the developing DRG reveals very low levels of both processes in wild-type and sox10baz1, excluding changes in the balance of these as an explanation for the overproduction of sensory neurons. Using chemical inhibition of Delta-Notch-Notch signaling we demonstrate that in embryonic zebrafish, as in mouse and chick, lateral inhibition during the phase of trunk DRG development is required to achieve a balance between glial and neuronal numbers. Importantly, however, we show that this mechanism is insufficient to explain quantitative aspects of the baz1 phenotype. The Sox10(baz1) protein shows a single amino acid substitution in the DNA binding HMG domain; structural analysis indicates that this change is likely to result in reduced flexibility in the HMG domain, consistent with sequence-specific modification of Sox10 binding to DNA. Unlike other Sox10 mutant proteins, Sox10(baz1) retains an ability to drive neurogenin1 transcription. We show that overexpression of neurogenin1 is sufficient to produce supernumerary DRG sensory neurons in a wild-type background, and can rescue the sensory neuron phenotype of sox10 morphants in a manner closely resembling the baz1 phenotype. We conclude that an imbalance of neuronal and glial fate specification results from the Sox10(baz1) protein's unique ability to drive sensory neuron specification whilst failing to drive glial development. The sox10baz1 phenotype reveals for the first time that a Notch-dependent lateral inhibition mechanism is not sufficient to fully explain the balance of neurons and glia in the developing DRGs, and that a second Sox10-dependent mechanism is necessary. Sox10 is thus a key transcription factor in achieving the balance of sensory neuronal and glial fates.

Indexed as

AnimalsCell LineageGanglia, SpinalMutationNeuronsReceptors, NotchSignal TransductionSOXE Transcription FactorsStem CellsTranscription, GeneticReceptors, NotchSOXE Transcription Factors

Identifiers

PMID28253350
PMCPMC5333849
OpenAlexW2226626398

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.