Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28253262›Full record

ArticlePloS one2017

Voluntary activation of biceps-to-triceps and deltoid-to-triceps transfers in quadriplegia.

Carrie L Peterson, Michael S Bednar, Anne M Bryden, Michael W Keith, Eric J Perreault, Wendy M Murray

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Estimating Voluntary Activation Of The Elbow And Wrist Muscles In Chronic Hemiparetic Stroke Using Twitch Interpolation Methodology.Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Annual International Conference · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Carrie L PetersonEdward Hines, Jr. VA Hospital, Hines, IL, United States of America.
Michael S BednarEdward Hines, Jr. VA Hospital, Hines, IL, United States of America.
Anne M BrydenThe Cleveland FES Center at MetroHealth, Cleveland, OH, United States of America.
Michael W KeithThe Cleveland FES Center at MetroHealth, Cleveland, OH, United States of America.
Eric J PerreaultSensory Motor Performance Program, Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago, Chicago, IL, United States of America.
Wendy M MurrayEdward Hines, Jr. VA Hospital, Hines, IL, United States of America.
Cleveland FES Center · USEdward Hines, Jr. VA Hospital · USNorthwestern University · USShirley Ryan AbilityLab · US

Funding

Northwestern University Clinical and Translational Science Institute (NUCATS)UL1TR001422 · NCATS · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI D'AQUILA, RICHARD · 2015 to 2023
$56.8M
A Comparison of Two Surgical Procedures that Restore Elbow ExtensionI01RX000377 · VA · EDWARD HINES JR VA HOSPITAL · PI MURRAY, WENDY M · 2012 to 2014
–
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001422
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The biceps or the posterior deltoid can be transferred to improve elbow extension function for many individuals with C5 or C6 quadriplegia. Maximum strength after elbow reconstruction is variable; the patient's ability to voluntarily activate the transferred muscle to extend the elbow may contribute to the variability. We compared voluntary activation during maximum isometric elbow extension following biceps transfer (n = 5) and deltoid transfer (n = 6) in three functional postures. Voluntary activation was computed as the elbow extension moment generated during maximum voluntary effort divided by the moment generated with full activation, which was estimated via electrical stimulation. Voluntary activation was on average 96% after biceps transfer and not affected by posture. Individuals with deltoid transfer demonstrated deficits in voluntary activation, which differed by posture (80% in horizontal plane, 69% in overhead reach, and 70% in weight-relief), suggesting inadequate motor re-education after deltoid transfer. Overall, individuals with a biceps transfer better activated their transferred muscle than those with a deltoid transfer. This difference in neural control augmented the greater force-generating capacity of the biceps leading to increased elbow extension strength after biceps transfer (average 9.37 N-m across postures) relative to deltoid transfer (average 2.76 N-m across postures) in our study cohort.

Indexed as

ArmDeltoid MuscleAdolescentAdultElbow JointFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedQuadriplegiaRange of Motion, ArticularTendon TransferTreatment OutcomeYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID28253262
PMCPMC5333805
OpenAlexW2591653078

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.