Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28253223›Full record

ArticleMedical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research2017

Observation and Clinical Pattern in Patients with White Dot Syndromes: The Role of Color Photography in Monitoring Ocular Changes in Long-Term Observation.

Joanna Brydak-Godowska, Joanna Gołębiewska, Monika Turczyńska, Joanna Moneta-Wielgoś, Agnieszka Samsel, Piotr K Borkowski, Michał Ciszek, Agnieszka Płonecka-Rodzoch, Aleksandra Kużnik-Borkowska, Joanna Ciszewska and 3 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Joanna Brydak-GodowskaDepartment of Ophthalmology, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.
Joanna GołębiewskaDepartment of Ophthalmology, Children's Memorial Health Institute, Warsaw, Poland.
Monika TurczyńskaDepartment of Ophthalmology, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.
Joanna Moneta-WielgośDepartment of Ophthalmology, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.
Agnieszka SamselDepartment of Ophthalmology, Children's Jan Bogdanowicz Hospital, Warsaw, Poland.
Piotr K BorkowskiDepartment of Infectious and Tropical Diseases and Hepatology, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.
Michał CiszekDepartment of Immunology, Transplantology, and Internal Diseases, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.
Agnieszka Płonecka-RodzochDepartment of Ophthalmology, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.
Aleksandra Kużnik-BorkowskaDepartment of Ophthalmology, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.
Joanna CiszewskaDepartment of Ophthalmology, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.
Elżbieta Makomaska-SzaroszykDepartment of Descriptive and Clinical Anatomy, Warsaw Medical University, Warsaw, Poland.
Lidia B BrydakNational Influenza Center NIPH-PZH, Warsaw, Poland.
Dariusz KęcikDepartment of Ophthalmology, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.
Medical University of Warsaw · PLChildren's Memorial Health Institute · PLNational Institute of Public Health · PLUniwersytecki Szpital Dziecięcy · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND The aim of this study was to assess the clinical course and distinctive features of different white dot syndromes (WDS) in patients attending the Ophthalmology Department, Medical University of Warsaw in the years 1995-2015. MATERIAL AND METHODS Sixty-two (62) patients (43 females and 19 males), aged 18 to 77 years, referred with a WDS were included in this prospective study, with observation period ranging from 5 months to 16 years. All patients underwent a complete ophthalmological examination and multimodal imaging studies. RESULTS In this cohort of 62 patients, the following WDS entities were identified: multifocal choroiditis with panuveitis (MFCPU), multifocal choroiditis (MFC), punctate inner choroidopathy (PIC), birdshot, acute posterior multifocal placoid pigment epitheliopathy (APMPPE), subretinal fibrosis and uveitis, multiple evanescent white dot syndrome (MEWDS), serpiginous choroiditis, and single cases of acute annular outer retinopathy (AAOR). CONCLUSIONS The study was performed at a Polish referral center and may to some extent reflect the varied geographical distribution of white dot syndromes, as none of the subjects was found to suffer from acute zonal occult outer retinopathy (AZOOR), acute macular neuroretinopathy (AMN), or diffuse unilateral subacute neuroretinitis (DUSN). Long-term follow-up is warranted by the evolution of lesions in the eye fundus, while management depends on correct diagnosis of WDS. When the posterior pole is involved in some cases of the WDS an immunosuppressive treatment, the use of the PDT or anti-VEGF injections were necessary.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedChoroiditisEye DiseasesFemaleFundus OculiHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleMiddle AgedMultifocal ChoroiditisPanuveitisPhotographyProspective StudiesRetinal Diseases

Identifiers

PMID28253223
PMCPMC5345700
OpenAlexW2591678612

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.