Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28253009›Full record

ArticleJournal of experimental psychology. General2017

Motor experience influences object knowledge.

Evangelia G Chrysikou, Daniel Casasanto, Sharon L Thompson-Schill

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of experimental psychology. General, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Evangelia G ChrysikouDepartment of Psychology.
Daniel CasasantoDepartment of Psychology, Grossman Institute for Neuroscience, University of Chicago.
Sharon L Thompson-SchillDepartment of Psychology, Center for Cognitive Neuroscience, University of Pennsylvania.

Funding

Linguistic and NonLinguistic Functions of Frontal CortexR01DC009209 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI THOMPSONSCHILL, SHARON L · 2008 to 2018
$5.2M
Visual Knowledge of ObjectsR01MH070850 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI THOMPSONSCHILL, SHARON L · 2005 to 2009
$1.8M
Effects of Psychopathology on Prefrontal Cortical Functioning During Goal-DirecteR21MH083029 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI THOMPSONSCHILL, SHARON L · 2009 to 2010
$433k
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC009209NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH070850NIMH NIH HHS R21 MH083029
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

An object's perceived readiness-for-action (e.g., its size, the degree of rotation from its canonical position, the user's viewpoint) can influence semantic knowledge retrieval. Yet, the organization of object knowledge may also be affected by body-specific sensorimotor experiences. Here, we investigated whether people's history of performing motor actions with their hands influences the knowledge they store and retrieve about graspable objects. We compared object representations between healthy right- and left-handers (Experiment 1), and between unilateral stroke patients, whose motor experience was changed by impairment of either their right or left hand (Experiment 2). Participants saw pictures of graspable everyday items with the handles oriented toward either the left or right hand, and they generated the type of grasp they would employ (i.e., clench or pinch) when using each object, responding orally. In both experiments, hand dominance and object orientation interacted to predict response times. In Experiment 1, judgments were fastest when objects were oriented toward the right hand in right-handers, but not in left-handers. In Experiment 2, judgments were fastest when objects were oriented toward the left hand in patients who had lost the use of their right hand, even though these patients were right-handed prior to brain injury. Results suggest that at least some aspects of object knowledge are determined by motor experience, and can be changed by new patterns of motor experience. People with different bodily characteristics, who interact with objects in systematically different ways, form correspondingly different neurocognitive representations of the same common objects. (PsycINFO Database Record

Indexed as

Form PerceptionFunctional LateralityHand StrengthPsychomotor PerformanceReaction TimeRecognition, PsychologyAdolescentAdultAgedApraxia, IdeomotorFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedOrientation, SpatialRetention, Psychology

Identifiers

PMID28253009
PMCPMC5335879

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.