Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28252636›Full record

ArticleGenetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics2017

The Exome Clinic and the role of medical genetics expertise in the interpretation of exome sequencing results.

Dustin Baldridge, Jennifer Heeley, Marisa Vineyard, Linda Manwaring, Tomi L Toler, Emily Fassi, Elise Fiala, Sarah Brown, Charles W Goss, Marcia Willing and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 65 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
65citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

65 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. A systematic literature review of disclosure practices and reported outcomes for medically actionable genomic secondary findings.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2021
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Randomized prospective evaluation of genome sequencing versus standard-of-care as a first molecular diagnostic test.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2021
    Trial
  6. Novel Variants Identified in Families With SNX27 -Related Neurodevelopmental Disorder, Aiding in Characterizing Its Genotypic and Phenotypic Spectrum.American journal of medical genetics. Part B, Neuropsychiatric genetics : the official publication of the International Society of Psychiatric Genetics · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. The recurrent p.Glu3Lys variant inMolecular genetics and metabolism reports · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. The Brain Gene Registry: a data snapshot.Journal of neurodevelopmental disorders · 2024
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

5 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Dustin BaldridgeDivision of Genetics and Genomic Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6027-6020
Jennifer HeeleyDivision of Genetics and Genomic Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2114-8066
Marisa VineyardDivision of Genetics and Genomic Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5448-1204
Linda ManwaringDivision of Genetics and Genomic Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.
Tomi L TolerDivision of Genetics and Genomic Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1637-8310
Emily FassiDivision of Genetics and Genomic Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9783-0013
Elise FialaDivision of Genetics and Genomic Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1626-5009
Sarah BrownDepartment of Pathology and Immunology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.
Charles W GossDivision of Biostatistics, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.
Marcia WillingDivision of Genetics and Genomic Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.
Dorothy K GrangeDivision of Genetics and Genomic Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.
Beth A KozelDivision of Genetics and Genomic Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.
Marwan ShinawiDivision of Genetics and Genomic Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.

Funding

Modifiers of elastin arteriopathyZIAHL006212 · NHLBI · NATIONAL HEART, LUNG, AND BLOOD INSTITUTE · PI KOZEL, BETH · 2016 to 2024
$9.7M
Washington University Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities Research Center-Administrative Down Syndrome SupplementU54HD087011 · NICHD · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI MOLEY, KELLE H · 2015 to 2019
$7.1M
Training in the Genetics and Molecular Biology of Mental DisordersT32MH014677 · NIMH · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI RICE, JOHN P. · 1985 to 2020
$3.6M
Omics of Inflammatory Airway DiseasesK12HL120002 · NHLBI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI COHEN, BARAK A, COLE, FRANCIS SESSIONS · 2013 to 2017
$1.3M
NHLBI NIH HHS K12 HL120002NICHD NIH HHS U54 HD087011NIMH NIH HHS T32 MH014677
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeEvaluation of the clinician's role in the optimal interpretation of clinical exome sequencing (ES) results.

methodsRetrospective chart review of the first 155 patients who underwent clinical ES in our Exome Clinic and direct interaction with the ordering geneticist to evaluate the process of interpretation of results.

resultsThe most common primary indication was neurodevelopmental problems (~66%), followed by multiple congenital anomalies (~10%). Based on sequencing data, the overall diagnostic yield was 36%. After assessment by the medical geneticist, incorporation of detailed phenotypic and molecular data, and utilization of additional diagnostic modalities, the final diagnostic yield increased to 43%. Seven patients in our cohort were included in initial case series that described novel genetic syndromes, and 23% of patients were involved in subsequent research studies directly related to their results or involved in efforts to move beyond clinical ES for diagnosis. Clinical management was directly altered due to the ES findings in 12% of definitively diagnosed cases.

conclusionsOur results emphasize the usefulness of ES, demonstrate the significant role of the medical geneticist in the diagnostic process of patients undergoing ES, and illustrate the benefits of postanalytical diagnostic work-up in solving the "diagnostic odyssey." Genet Med advance online publication 02 March 2017.

Indexed as

ExomeExome SequencingExpert TestimonyGenetics, MedicalGenetic TestingAdolescentAdultChildChild, PreschoolFemaleGenetic CounselingGenetic Diseases, InbornHumansInfantInfant, NewbornMale

Identifiers

PMID28252636
PMCPMC5581723

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.