Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28252524›Full record

Observational studyPediatric critical care medicine : a journal of the Society of Critical Care Medicine and the World Federation of Pediatric Intensive and Critical Care Societies2017

Development and Prospective Validation of Tools to Accurately Identify Neurosurgical and Critical Care Events in Children With Traumatic Brain Injury.

Tellen D Bennett, Peter E DeWitt, Rebecca R Dixon, Cory Kartchner, Yamila Sierra, Diane Ladell, Rajendu Srivastava, Jay Riva-Cambrin, Allison Kempe, Desmond K Runyan and 2 more

Abstract readMulticenter StudyObservational StudyValidation Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Pediatric critical care medicine : a journal of the Society of Critical Care Medicine and the World Federation of Pediatric Intensive and Critical Care Societies, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Factors Associated With Neurobehavioral Complications in Pediatric Abdominal Organ Transplant Recipients Identified Using Computable Composite Definitions.Pediatric critical care medicine : a journal of the Society of Critical Care Medicine and the World Federation of Pediatric Intensive and Critical Care Societies · 2020
    Article
  11. Untangling the complexity of multimorbidity with machine learning.Mechanisms of ageing and development · 2020
    Review
  12. Data Science for Child Health.The Journal of pediatrics · 2019
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Phenotyping in Pediatric Traumatic Brain Injury.Pediatric critical care medicine : a journal of the Society of Critical Care Medicine and the World Federation of Pediatric Intensive and Critical Care Societies · 2018
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Hospital Readmissions After Pediatric Trauma.Pediatric critical care medicine : a journal of the Society of Critical Care Medicine and the World Federation of Pediatric Intensive and Critical Care Societies · 2018
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Why Everyone Should Care About "Computable Phenotypes".Pediatric critical care medicine : a journal of the Society of Critical Care Medicine and the World Federation of Pediatric Intensive and Critical Care Societies · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Tellen D Bennett1Section of Pediatric Critical Care, Department of Pediatrics, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO. 2Children's Hospital Colorado, Aurora, CO. 3Adult and Child Consortium for Health Outcomes Research and Delivery Science (ACCORDS), University of Colorado School of Medicine and Children's Hospital Colorado, Aurora, CO. 4Division of Pediatric Critical Care, Department of Pediatrics, Colorado School of Public Health, Aurora, CO. 5Pediatric Critical Care, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT. 6Department of Bioinformatics and Biostatistics, Primary Children's Hospital, Salt Lake City, UT. 7Division of Pediatric Inpatient Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT. 8Office of Research, Intermountain Healthcare, Salt Lake City, UT. 9Division of Pediatric Neurosurgery, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Calgary and Alberta Children's Hospital, Calgary, AB, Canada. 10Department of Pediatrics, Kempe Center, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO.
Peter E DeWitt
Rebecca R Dixon
Cory Kartchner
Yamila Sierra
Diane Ladell
Rajendu Srivastava
Jay Riva-Cambrin
Allison Kempe
Desmond K Runyan
Heather T Keenan
J Michael Dean

Funding

Colorado Clinical and Translational Sciences InstituteUL1TR001082 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI SOKOL, RONALD J. · 2013 to 2017
$48.0M
Effectiveness of ICP Monitoring in Pediatric Traumatic Brain InjuryK23HD074620 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI BENNETT, TELLEN · 2013 to 2017
$701k
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001082NICHD NIH HHS K23 HD074620
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo develop and validate case definitions (computable phenotypes) to accurately identify neurosurgical and critical care events in children with traumatic brain injury.

designProspective observational cohort study, May 2013 to September 2015.

settingTwo large U.S. children's hospitals with level 1 Pediatric Trauma Centers. PATIENTS: One hundred seventy-four children less than 18 years old admitted to an ICU after traumatic brain injury. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN

resultsProspective data were linked to database codes for each patient. The outcomes were prospectively identified acute traumatic brain injury, intracranial pressure monitor placement, craniotomy or craniectomy, vascular catheter placement, invasive mechanical ventilation, and new gastrostomy tube or tracheostomy placement. Candidate predictors were database codes present in administrative, billing, or trauma registry data. For each clinical event, we developed and validated penalized regression and Boolean classifiers (models to identify clinical events that take database codes as predictors). We externally validated the best model for each clinical event. The primary model performance measure was accuracy, the percent of test patients correctly classified. The cohort included 174 children who required ICU admission after traumatic brain injury. Simple Boolean classifiers were greater than or equal to 94% accurate for seven of nine clinical diagnoses and events. For central venous catheter placement, no classifier achieved 90% accuracy. Classifier accuracy was dependent on available data fields. Five of nine classifiers were acceptably accurate using only administrative data but three required trauma registry fields and two required billing data.

conclusionsIn children with traumatic brain injury, computable phenotypes based on simple Boolean classifiers were highly accurate for most neurosurgical and critical care diagnoses and events. The computable phenotypes we developed and validated can be used in any observational study of children with traumatic brain injury and can reasonably be applied in studies of these interventions in other patient populations.

Indexed as

Critical CareDecision Support TechniquesNeurosurgical ProceduresAdolescentBrain Injuries, TraumaticChildChild, PreschoolDatabases, FactualFemaleGlasgow Coma ScaleHumansInfantInfant, NewbornLogistic ModelsMalePhenotype

Identifiers

PMID28252524
PMCPMC5419849

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.