Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28252053›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2017

Gene Deletion in Barley Mediated by LTR-retrotransposon BARE.

Yi Shang, Fei Yang, Alan H Schulman, Jinghuan Zhu, Yong Jia, Junmei Wang, Xiao-Qi Zhang, Qiaojun Jia, Wei Hua, Jianming Yang and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
6.1field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Long Tandem Arrays ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Yi ShangNational Barley Improvement Centre, Institute of Crop and Nuclear Technology Utilization, Zhejiang Academy of Agricultural Science, Hangzhou 310021, China.
Fei YangDepartment of Genetics and Cell Biology, Yangtze University, Jingzhou, Hubei 434023, China.
Alan H SchulmanLuke/BI Plant Genomics Lab, Institute of Biotechnology and Viikki Plant Science Centre, University of Helsinki, FIN-00014 Helsinki, Finland.
Jinghuan ZhuNational Barley Improvement Centre, Institute of Crop and Nuclear Technology Utilization, Zhejiang Academy of Agricultural Science, Hangzhou 310021, China.
Yong JiaWestern Barley Genetics Alliance, Murdoch University, 90 South Street, Murdoch WA 6150, Australia.
Junmei WangNational Barley Improvement Centre, Institute of Crop and Nuclear Technology Utilization, Zhejiang Academy of Agricultural Science, Hangzhou 310021, China.
Xiao-Qi ZhangWestern Barley Genetics Alliance, Murdoch University, 90 South Street, Murdoch WA 6150, Australia.
Qiaojun JiaCollege of Life Sciences, Zhejiang Sci-Tech University, Hangzhou 310018, China.
Wei HuaNational Barley Improvement Centre, Institute of Crop and Nuclear Technology Utilization, Zhejiang Academy of Agricultural Science, Hangzhou 310021, China.
Jianming YangNational Barley Improvement Centre, Institute of Crop and Nuclear Technology Utilization, Zhejiang Academy of Agricultural Science, Hangzhou 310021, China.
Chengdao LiDepartment of Genetics and Cell Biology, Yangtze University, Jingzhou, Hubei 434023, China.
ZheJiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences · CNMurdoch University · AUYangtze University · CNUniversity of Helsinki · FIZhejiang Sci-Tech University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A poly-row branched spike (prbs) barley mutant was obtained from soaking a two-rowed barley inflorescence in a solution of maize genomic DNA. Positional cloning and sequencing demonstrated that the prbs mutant resulted from a 28 kb deletion including the inflorescence architecture gene HvRA2. Sequence annotation revealed that the HvRA2 gene is flanked by two LTR (long terminal repeat) retrotransposons (BARE) sharing 89% sequence identity. A recombination between the integrase (IN) gene regions of the two BARE copies resulted in the formation of an intact BARE and loss of HvRA2. No maize DNA was detected in the recombination region although the flanking sequences of HvRA2 gene showed over 73% of sequence identity with repetitive sequences on 10 maize chromosomes. It is still unknown whether the interaction of retrotransposons between barley and maize has resulted in the recombination observed in the present study.

Indexed as

Gene DeletionBase SequenceChromosome MappingChromosomes, PlantDNA, PlantGenes, PlantHordeumInflorescenceMutagenesis, InsertionalPlant ProteinsRetroelementsSequence Homology, Nucleic AcidTerminal Repeat SequencesZea maysDNA, PlantPlant ProteinsRetroelements

Identifiers

PMID28252053
PMCPMC5333098
OpenAlexW2593135877

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.