Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28251838›Full record

ArticleInternational wound journal2017

Is hyperbaric oxygen therapy indispensable for saving mutilated hand injuries?

I-Han Chiang, Yuan-Sheng Tzeng, Shun-Cheng Chang

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International wound journal, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Current Use of Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy in Plastic Surgery: A Systematic Review.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

I-Han ChiangDivision of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Tri-Service General Hospital, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei, Taiwan, Republic of China.
Yuan-Sheng TzengDivision of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Tri-Service General Hospital, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei, Taiwan, Republic of China.
Shun-Cheng ChangDivision of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy Center, Shuang-Ho Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan, Republic of China.
Tri-Service General Hospital · TWTaipei Medical University-Shuang Ho Hospital · TW

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mutilated hand injuries are a profound challenge to the plastic surgeon, and such injuries often lead to limb loss and severe functional impairment. Hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) appears to counteract tissue hypoxia and stimulate acute wound healing. This study was performed to evaluate the efficacy of HBOT as an adjunctive therapy in patients with a mutilated hand injury. Between January 2006 and December 2014, 45 patients with a mutilated hand injury were enrolled. After reconstruction or revascularisation, patients underwent 120 minutes of HBOT with oxygen at 2·5 atmospheres absolute while breathing 100% oxygen. Outcomes such as amputee survival and surgery-related complications were recorded. The patients were 38 men and 7 women with average age of 37·2 years (range 18-62). The mean defect area was 131·5 cm

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultFemaleHand InjuriesHumansHyperbaric OxygenationMaleMiddle AgedPlastic Surgery ProceduresSkin TransplantationSoft Tissue InjuriesWound HealingYoung AdultCrush hand injuryHyperbaric oxygen therapyMutilated hand

Identifiers

PMID28251838
PMCPMC7950024
OpenAlexW2594926327

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.