Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28251355›Full record

ArticleTechniques in coloproctology2017

Long-term results of transanal endoscopic microsurgery after endoscopic polypectomy of malignant rectal adenoma.

T Junginger, U Goenner, M Hitzler, T T Trinh, A Heintz, M Blettner, D Wollschlaeger

Abstract readEvaluation Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Techniques in coloproctology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 43% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

T JungingerDepartment of General and Abdominal Surgery, University Medical Centre of the Johannes Gutenberg-University, Langenbeckstr. 1, 55131, Mainz, Germany. Junginger@uni-mainz.de.
U GoennerDepartment of General and Abdominal Surgery, University Medical Centre of the Johannes Gutenberg-University, Langenbeckstr. 1, 55131, Mainz, Germany.
M HitzlerDepartment of General, Visceral and Vascular Surgery, Catholic Hospital, Mainz, Germany.
T T TrinhDepartment of Heart, Chest and Vascular Surgery, University Medical Centre of the Johannes Gutenberg-University, Mainz, Germany.
A HeintzDepartment of General, Visceral and Vascular Surgery, Catholic Hospital, Mainz, Germany.
M BlettnerInstitute of Medical Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics, University Medical Centre of the Johannes Gutenberg-University, Mainz, Germany.
D WollschlaegerInstitute of Medical Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics, University Medical Centre of the Johannes Gutenberg-University, Mainz, Germany.
Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz · DECatholic University of Applied Sciences · DEUniversity Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere is no consensus on the treatment and prognosis of malignant rectal polyps. The aim of the present study was to determine the role of transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM) after endoscopic complete polypectomy of malignant rectal adenomas with long-term follow-up.

methodsOf 105 patients with pT1 rectal carcinoma in 32 patients TEM followed complete endoscopic polypectomy while 73 had primary TEM. Local recurrence (LR), distant metastasis, overall and cancer-specific survival were determined by the Kaplan-Meier method.

resultsMedian follow-up was 9.1 years. In 32 patients with TEM following complete polypectomy no residual cancer was found. LR occurred in 3/28 (11%) patients with low-risk carcinoma (pT1 G1/2/X, L0/X, R0) and in 1/4 (25%) with high-risk carcinoma (pT1 G3/4 or L1). After primary TEM with complete resection (minimal distance >1 mm) LR occurred in 6/60 (10%) with low-risk carcinoma. After incomplete TEM resection (minimal distance ≤1 mm) LR occurred in 3/8 (38%) patients with low-risk and in 1/5 (20%) patients with high-risk carcinoma. Grading was the only significant risk factor for LR after endoscopic polypectomy followed by TEM (p = 0.002). At all outcomes did not differ between postpolypectomy TEM and primary TEM.

conclusionsPatients with malignant rectal polyps removed by endoscopic polypectomy have a substantial risk of LR even if TEM of polyp site is cancer free. Risk of LR depends on tumor characteristics. In low-risk carcinoma long-term follow-up is necessary. The high LR rate in patients with high-risk rectal carcinoma restricts the use of TEM alone.

Indexed as

AdenocarcinomaAgedCarcinomaCombined Modality TherapyFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalPolypsProctoscopyRectal NeoplasmsRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsEndoscopic polypectomyMalignant rectal polypPrognosisTransanal endoscopic microsurgery

Identifiers

PMID28251355
OpenAlexW2594629989

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.