Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28251333›Full record

ArticleNeuroradiology2017

Recognizing subtle near-occlusion in carotid stenosis patients: a computed tomography angiographic study.

Suvi Maaria Koskinen, Heli Silvennoinen, Petra Ijäs, Krista Nuotio, Leena Valanne, Perttu J Lindsberg, Lauri Soinne

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Neuroradiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Suvi Maaria KoskinenClinicum, Department of Neurosciences, University of Helsinki, Haartmaninkatu 8, Biomedicum 1 Helsinki, Room B412b, PO Box 700, 00029 HUS, Helsinki, Finland. suvi.koskinen@helsinki.fi.
Heli SilvennoinenHUS Medical Imaging Center, Radiology, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.
Petra IjäsNeurology, Clinical Neurosciences, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.
Krista NuotioNeurology, Clinical Neurosciences, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.
Leena ValanneHUS Medical Imaging Center, Radiology, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.
Perttu J LindsbergNeurology, Clinical Neurosciences, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.
Lauri SoinneNeurology, Clinical Neurosciences, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.
Helsinki University Hospital · FIUniversity of Helsinki · FI

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionNear-occlusion of the internal carotid artery (ICA) is a significant luminal diameter (LD) reduction beyond a tight atherosclerotic carotid stenosis (CS). Recognition of even subtle near-occlusions is essential to prevent underestimation of the stenosis degree. Our goal was to investigate the prevalence of near-occlusion among CS patients using a single standard criterion to facilitate its recognition, even when distal ICA LD reduction is not visually evident in computed tomography angiography (CTA).

methodsWe analysed carotid artery CTAs of 467 patients with moderate-to-severe CS scheduled for endarterectomy. We performed measurements of the bilateral distal ICA LDs from thin axial source images and utilized a 1.0 mm intra-individual side-to-side distal ICA LD difference to distinguish near-occlusions, based on a previous study, aware of the vagaries of measurement. For analysis stratification, we excluded cases with significant carotid pathology affecting LD measurements.

resultsWe discovered 126 near-occlusions fulfilling our criterion of ipsilateral near-occlusion: the mean LD side-to-side difference (mm) with 95% confidence interval being 1.8 (1.6, 1.9) and a standard deviation of 0.8 mm. Among the 233 cases not meeting our near-occlusion criterion, we found 140 moderate (50-69%) and 93 severe (70-99%) ipsilateral stenoses.

conclusionThe utilization of 1.0 mm cut-off value for the intra-individual distal ICA LD side-to-side difference to distinguish atherosclerotic ICA near-occlusion leads to a relatively high incidence of near-occlusion. In CTA, recently suggested to be used for near-occlusion diagnosis, a discriminatory 1.0 mm cut-off value could function as a pragmatic tool to enhance the detection of even subtle near-occlusions.

Indexed as

Computed Tomography AngiographyAgedCarotid Artery, InternalCarotid StenosisFemaleHumansMaleRadiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-AssistedSeverity of Illness IndexAtherosclerosisCarotid stenosisComputed tomography angiographyNear-occlusion

Identifiers

PMID28251333
OpenAlexW2594131015

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.