Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28251327›Full record

ReviewNeuroradiology2017

Leo stent for endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms: very long-term results in 50 patients with 52 aneurysms and literature review.

Boris Lubicz, Alexandre Kadou, Ricardo Morais, Benjamin Mine

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Neuroradiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Endovascular Treatment of Intracranial Aneurysms.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Boris LubiczDepartment of Interventional Neuroradiology, Erasme University Hospital, 808 route de Lennik, 1070, Bruxelles, Belgium. blubicz@ulb.ac.be.
Alexandre KadouDepartment of Interventional Neuroradiology, Erasme University Hospital, 808 route de Lennik, 1070, Bruxelles, Belgium.
Ricardo MoraisDepartment of Interventional Neuroradiology, Erasme University Hospital, 808 route de Lennik, 1070, Bruxelles, Belgium.
Benjamin MineDepartment of Interventional Neuroradiology, Erasme University Hospital, 808 route de Lennik, 1070, Bruxelles, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe Leo stent was the first retrievable stent for endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms (IAs). We report our experience with this device with emphasis on very long-term follow-up.

methodsThis study was approved by authors' ethical committee. A retrospective review of our prospectively maintained database identified all patients treated for a saccular IA with this stent in our institution. Technical issues and immediate and long-term outcomes (at least 12 months) were evaluated.

resultsBetween 2004 and 2015, 50 patients with 52 IAs were identified. In two patients, the stent could not safely be placed (failure rate = 3.8%). Among 48 treated patients with 50 IAs, there were 44 women and 4 men (mean age, 53 years). Mean aneurysm diameter was 7.2 mm. All IAs but six were wide-necked. There was no immediate morbidity or mortality. Anatomical results included 76% complete occlusions, 22% neck remnants, and 2% incomplete occlusions. Mean follow-up was 50.2 months (range, 12-139 months). Two patients had delayed TIAs but long-term morbidity rate remained = 0%. At follow-up, occlusion was stable in 68% IAs, showed thrombosis in 12%, and recanalization in 20% IAs. Complementary treatment was required in 8% IAs. Final results showed 70% complete occlusions, 24% neck remnants, and 6% incomplete occlusions. Asymptomatic stent occlusion and significant stenosis occurred in one and two cases, respectively.

conclusionThe Leo stent is safe and effective for treatment of wide-necked saccular IAs. Very long-term results show high rates of adequate and stable occlusion. Moreover, the stent is well tolerated.

Indexed as

StentsEndovascular ProceduresFemaleHumansIntracranial AneurysmMaleMiddle AgedProsthesis DesignRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeCoilingIntracranial aneurysmsStent

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.