ReviewChild's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery2017
Middle cerebral artery aneurysm rupture in a neonate with interrupted aortic arch: case report.
Review in Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Ruptured vertebrobasilar junction aneurysm coexisting with isolated interrupted aortic arch and basilar artery hypoplasia in an adult female: illustrative case.Journal of neurosurgery. Case lessons · 2025Article
- Perinatal Diagnosis and Management of a Case with Interrupted Aortic Arch, Pulmonary Valve Dysplasia and 22q11.2 Deletion: A Case Report.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2023Article
- Ruptured Middle Cerebral Artery Aneurysm in an Infant: Case Report and Literature Review.NMC case report journal · 2023Article
- Ruptured cerebral aneurysm in isolated type A interrupted aortic arch managed by transradial endovascular route: A case report with literature review.The neuroradiology journal · 2022Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionArterial cerebral aneurysms in the neonatal population are rare, and while the association of interrupted aortic arch and intracranial aneurysm has been reported in the adult and pediatric population (three cases each), to date, it has not been reported in the neonate. CASE REPORT: We report the case of a 26-day-old girl who presented with a generalized seizure 2 weeks after undergoing congenital heart surgery. Head CT revealed diffuse SAH with a 1.7 × 2.9-cm frontal intra-parenchymal hematoma with subdural extension producing 3 mm of midline shift. CTA evidenced a 2-mm left MCA bifurcation aneurysm, and the patient was taken to the operating room for clipping. Twenty-four-hour post-operative head CT showed ventriculomegaly and an EVD was placed. It was removed 4 days later without the need for permanent CSF diversion, and after this, her hospital stay was uneventful and she was discharged home. At 25 months of age, she was meeting developmental milestones. At this time, she underwent further heart surgery and expired shortly thereafter due to cardiomyopathy.
conclusionHere, we report the successful treatment of a ruptured neonatal aneurysm, and the first known case associated with interrupted aortic arch. Given the time and presentation, this patient likely illustrates the role of hemodynamic factors in the rupture of neonatal aneurysms. In reviewing all of the reported cases of neonatal aneurysms, promptly securing the aneurysm by either open clipping, parent vessel occlusion, or endovascular coiling is strongly preferable to no surgical intervention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.