Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28251287›Full record

SynthesisOsteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA2017

Nutrition and physical activity in the prevention and treatment of sarcopenia: systematic review.

C Beaudart, A Dawson, S C Shaw, N C Harvey, J A Kanis, N Binkley, J Y Reginster, R Chapurlat, D C Chan, O Bruyère and 4 more

4 registry-linked trialsOpen access · hybridAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 4 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 296 papers, 15 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
296citing papers in PubMed, 15 pooled it
27.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04484961 nacompletednot on this map

Effects of Blood Flow Restriction Rehabilitation After Bone Patellar Tendon Bone Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

TypeinterventionalSponsorThe Methodist Hospital Research InstituteRan2016 to 2020Enrolled50ConditionsACL TearArmsBlood flow restriction (BFR)
NCT04617392 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

Research of Sarcopenia in Patients After Bariatric-metabolic Surgery - the Effect of Programmed Aerobic and Power Exercising on the Functionality, Volume and Morphology of Muscle Tissue

TypeinterventionalSponsorMasaryk UniversityRan2021 to 2024Enrolled50ConditionsSarcopenia, Obesity, Sarcopenic ObesityArmsLaparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy, Strength endurance training
NCT06088511 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Effectiveness of a Dyadic e-Health System on Enhancing Healthy Lifestyles of Older Adults With Sarcopenia: A Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorThe Hong Kong Polytechnic UniversityRan2024 to 2026Enrolled88ConditionsSarcopeniaArmse-Health System with nutritional advice, The Exercise Training
NCT07754760 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Essential Amino Acid Supplementation Enhances Post-prandial Amino Acid Availability Following a Standard-protein Breakfast in Older Adults: a Randomised Crossover Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorLeeds Beckett UniversityRan2022 to 2022Enrolled10ConditionsOlder Adults Without Any Specific Clinical ConditionArmsEssential amino acid supplement, Placebo
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

296 citing papers in PubMed, 15 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 580 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Understanding the gut microbiota and sarcopenia: a systematic review.Journal of cachexia, sarcopenia and muscle · 2021
    Pooled it
  12. Pooled it
  13. Pooled it
  14. Pooled it
  15. Pooled it
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Trial
  19. Trial
  20. Trial

236 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 5 institutions in 7 countries.

C BeaudartMRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton General Hospital, Southampton, SO16 6YD, UK.
A DawsonMRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton General Hospital, Southampton, SO16 6YD, UK.
S C ShawMRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton General Hospital, Southampton, SO16 6YD, UK.
N C HarveyMRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton General Hospital, Southampton, SO16 6YD, UK.
J A KanisCentre for Metabolic Bone Disease, Medical School, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
N BinkleyUniversity of Wisconsin Osteoporosis Clinical Center and Research Program, Madison, WI, USA.
J Y ReginsterDepartment of Public Health, Epidemiology and Health Economics, University of Liège, Liège, Belgium.
R ChapurlatINSERM UMR 1033, Université de Lyon, Hôpital E Herriot, Lyon, France.
D C ChanDepartment of Geriatrics and Gerontology, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
O BruyèreDepartment of Public Health, Epidemiology and Health Economics, University of Liège, Liège, Belgium.
R RizzoliService of Bone Diseases, Geneva University Hospitals and Faculty of Medicine, Geneva, Switzerland.
C CooperMRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton General Hospital, Southampton, SO16 6YD, UK. cc@mrc.soton.ac.uk.
E M DennisonMRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton General Hospital, Southampton, SO16 6YD, UK.
IOF-ESCEO Sarcopenia Working Group
Southampton General Hospital · GBUniversity of Liège · BEUniversité Claude Bernard Lyon 1 · FRUniversity of Wisconsin–Madison · USUniversity of Oxford · GB

Funding

Arthritis Research UK 17702Arthritis Research UK 21231Department of Health HTA/10/33/04Medical Research Council G0400491Medical Research Council MC_U147574212Medical Research Council MC_U147574234Medical Research Council MC_U147574237Medical Research Council MC_U147585819Medical Research Council MC_U147585824Medical Research Council MC_U147585827Medical Research Council MC_UP_A620_1014Medical Research Council MC_UP_A620_1015Medical Research Council MC_UU_12011/1Medical Research Council MC_UU_12011/2Versus Arthritis 19583
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This systematic review summarizes the effect of combined exercise and nutrition intervention on muscle mass and muscle function. A total of 37 RCTs were identified. Results indicate that physical exercise has a positive impact on muscle mass and muscle function in subjects aged 65 years and older. However, any interactive effect of dietary supplementation appears to be limited.

introductionIn 2013, Denison et al. conducted a systematic review including 17 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to explore the effect of combined exercise and nutrition intervention to improve muscle mass, muscle strength, or physical performance in older people. They concluded that further studies were needed to provide evidence upon which public health and clinical recommendations could be based. The purpose of the present work was to update the prior systematic review and include studies published up to October 2015.

methodsUsing the electronic databases MEDLINE and EMBASE, we identified RCTs which assessed the combined effect of exercise training and nutritional supplementation on muscle strength, muscle mass, or physical performance in subjects aged 60 years and over. Study selection and data extraction were performed by two independent reviewers.

resultsThe search strategy identified 21 additional RCTs giving a total of 37 RCTs. Studies were heterogeneous in terms of protocols for physical exercise and dietary supplementation (proteins, essential amino acids, creatine, β-hydroxy-β-methylbuthyrate, vitamin D, multi-nutrients, or other). In 79% of the studies (27/34 RCTs), muscle mass increased with exercise but an additional effect of nutrition was only found in 8 RCTs (23.5%). Muscle strength increased in 82.8% of the studies (29/35 RCTs) following exercise intervention, and dietary supplementation showed additional benefits in only a small number of studies (8/35 RCTS, 22.8%). Finally, the majority of studies showed an increase of physical performance following exercise intervention (26/28 RCTs, 92.8%) but interaction with nutrition supplementation was only found in 14.3% of these studies (4/28 RCTs).

conclusionPhysical exercise has a positive impact on muscle mass and muscle function in healthy subjects aged 60 years and older. The biggest effect of exercise intervention, of any type, has been seen on physical performance (gait speed, chair rising test, balance, SPPB test, etc.). We observed huge variations in regard to the dietary supplementation protocols. Based on the included studies, mainly performed on well-nourished subjects, the interactive effect of dietary supplementation on muscle function appears limited.

Indexed as

Dietary SupplementsAmino Acids, EssentialCreatineDietary ProteinsExerciseExercise TherapyHumansMuscle StrengthSarcopeniaValeratesVitamin DAmino Acids, Essentialbeta-hydroxyisovaleric acidCreatineDietary ProteinsValeratesVitamin DDietaryInterventionPhysical activitySarcopenia

Identifiers

PMID28251287
PMCPMC5457808
OpenAlexW2593764183

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.