ArticleJournal of neuroscience and neuroengineering2012
Living Brain Optical Imaging: Technology, Methods and Applications.
Article in Journal of neuroscience and neuroengineering, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Neurophotonic methods in approach to in vivo animal epileptic models: Advantages and limitations.Epilepsia · 2024Review
- Article
- High-dynamic-range fluorescence laminar optical tomography (HDR-FLOT).Biomedical optics express · 2017Article
- Planar implantable sensor for in vivo measurement of cellular oxygen metabolism in brain tissue.Journal of neuroscience methods · 2017Article
- Correlation between volumetric oxygenation responses and electrophysiology identifies deep thalamocortical activity during epileptic seizures.Neurophotonics · 2017Article
- Review of mesoscopic optical tomography for depth-resolved imaging of hemodynamic changes and neural activities.Neurophotonics · 2017Review
- In Vivo Mesoscopic Voltage-Sensitive Dye Imaging of Brain Activation.Scientific reports · 2016Article
- Multiplane spectroscopic whole-body photoacoustic imaging of small animals in vivo.Medical & biological engineering & computing · 2016Article
- Study of the cortical representation of whisker frequency selectivity using voltage-sensitive dye optical imaging.Intravital · 2016Article
- In Vivo Voltage-Sensitive Dye Imaging of Subcortical Brain Function.Scientific reports · 2015Article
- Improving neurovascular outcomes with bilateral forepaw stimulation in a rat photothrombotic ischemic stroke model.Neurophotonics · 2014Article
- Relationship between working memory performance and neural activation measured using near-infrared spectroscopy.Brain and behavior · 2014Article
- Imaging of temperature dependent hemodynamics in the rat sciatic nerve by functional photoacoustic microscopy.Biomedical engineering online · 2013Article
- Photoacoustic and optical coherence tomography of epilepsy with high temporal and spatial resolution and dual optical contrasts.Journal of neuroscience methods · 2013Article
- Neurovascular coupling: in vivo optical techniques for functional brain imaging.Biomedical engineering online · 2013Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Within the last few decades, optical imaging methods have yielded revolutionary results when applied to all parts of the central nervous system. The purpose of this review is to analyze research possibilities and limitations of several novel imaging techniques and show some of the most interesting achievements obtained by these methods. Here we covered intrinsic optical imaging, voltage-sensitive dye, photoacoustic, optical coherence tomography, near-infrared spectroscopy and some other techniques. All of them are mainly applicable for experimental neuroscience but some of them also suitable for the clinical studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.