Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28250818›Full record

ArticleBiotechnology for biofuels2017

Integrating enzyme fermentation in lignocellulosic ethanol production: life-cycle assessment and techno-economic analysis.

Johanna Olofsson, Zsolt Barta, Pål Börjesson, Ola Wallberg

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biotechnology for biofuels, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
5.9field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 117 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Engineering ethanologenic bacteriumSynthetic and systems biotechnology · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. ThermophilicFrontiers in microbiology · 2022
    Article
  7. A critical review of life cycle assessment studies of woody biomass conversion to sugars.Philosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences · 2021
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Evolutionary engineering ofBiotechnology for biofuels · 2020
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Johanna OlofssonDivision of Environmental and Energy Systems Studies, Department of Technology and Society, Lund University, John Ericssons väg 1, 22363 Lund, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0001-7215-4162
Zsolt BartaDepartment of Applied Biotechnology and Food Science, Faculty of Chemical Technology and Biotechnology, Budapest University of Technology and Economics, Muegyetem rkp. 3, Budapest, 1111 Hungary.
Pål BörjessonDivision of Environmental and Energy Systems Studies, Department of Technology and Society, Lund University, John Ericssons väg 1, 22363 Lund, Sweden.
Ola WallbergDepartment of Chemical Engineering, Lund University, Naturvetarvägen 14, 22362 Lund, Sweden.
Ericsson (Sweden) · SEBudapest University of Technology and Economics · HULund University · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCellulase enzymes have been reported to contribute with a significant share of the total costs and greenhouse gas emissions of lignocellulosic ethanol production today. A potential future alternative to purchasing enzymes from an off-site manufacturer is to integrate enzyme and ethanol production, using microorganisms and part of the lignocellulosic material as feedstock for enzymes. This study modelled two such integrated process designs for ethanol from logging residues from spruce production, and compared it to an off-site case based on existing data regarding purchased enzymes. Greenhouse gas emissions and primary energy balances were studied in a life-cycle assessment, and cost performance in a techno-economic analysis.

resultsThe base case scenario suggests that greenhouse gas emissions per MJ of ethanol could be significantly lower in the integrated cases than in the off-site case. However, the difference between the integrated and off-site cases is reduced with alternative assumptions regarding enzyme dosage and the environmental impact of the purchased enzymes. The comparison of primary energy balances did not show any significant difference between the cases. The minimum ethanol selling price, to reach break-even costs, was from 0.568 to 0.622 EUR L

conclusionsAn integrated process design could reduce greenhouse gas emissions from lignocellulose-based ethanol production, and the cost of an integrated process could be comparable to purchasing enzymes produced off-site. This study focused on the environmental and economic assessment of an integrated process, and in order to strengthen the comparison to the off-site case, more detailed and updated data regarding industrial off-site enzyme production are especially important.

Indexed as

BioethanolCellulasesGreenhouse gasesLCAOff-siteOn-siteProcess economicsSecond generation (2G)

Identifiers

PMID28250818
PMCPMC5324314
OpenAlexW2591213936

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.