Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28250812›Full record

ArticleEvolutionary applications2017

A genome scan for selection signatures comparing farmed Atlantic salmon with two wild populations: Testing colocalization among outlier markers, candidate genes, and quantitative trait loci for production traits.

Lei Liu, Keng Pee Ang, J A K Elliott, Matthew Peter Kent, Sigbjørn Lien, Danielle MacDonald, Elizabeth Grace Boulding

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Evolutionary applications, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
6.3field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 54 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Genomic selection signatures in farmedEvolutionary applications · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Lei LiuDepartment of Integrative Biology University of Guelph Guelph ON Canada; Present address: School of Marine Sciences Ningbo University Ningbo China.
Keng Pee AngCooke Aquaculture Inc. Blacks Harbour NB Canada.
J A K ElliottCooke Aquaculture Inc. Blacks Harbour NB Canada.
Matthew Peter KentDepartment of Animal and Aquacultural Sciences (IHA) Center for Integrative Genetics (CIGENE) Norwegian University of Life Sciences Ås Norway.
Sigbjørn LienDepartment of Animal and Aquacultural Sciences (IHA) Center for Integrative Genetics (CIGENE) Norwegian University of Life Sciences Ås Norway.
Danielle MacDonaldSaint Andrews Biological Station Department of Fisheries and Oceans Canada Saint Andrews NB Canada.
Elizabeth Grace BouldingDepartment of Integrative Biology University of Guelph Guelph ON Canada.
Cooke Aquaculture (Canada) · CANorwegian University of Life Sciences · NOUniversity of Guelph · CAFisheries and Oceans Canada · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Comparative genome scans can be used to identify chromosome regions, but not traits, that are putatively under selection. Identification of targeted traits may be more likely in recently domesticated populations under strong artificial selection for increased production. We used a North American Atlantic salmon 6K SNP dataset to locate genome regions of an aquaculture strain (Saint John River) that were highly diverged from that of its putative wild founder population (Tobique River). First, admixed individuals with partial European ancestry were detected using STRUCTURE and removed from the dataset. Outlier loci were then identified as those showing extreme differentiation between the aquaculture population and the founder population. All Arlequin methods identified an overlapping subset of 17 outlier loci, three of which were also identified by BayeScan. Many outlier loci were near candidate genes and some were near published quantitative trait loci (QTLs) for growth, appetite, maturity, or disease resistance. Parallel comparisons using a wild, nonfounder population (Stewiacke River) yielded only one overlapping outlier locus as well as a known maturity QTL. We conclude that genome scans comparing a recently domesticated strain with its wild founder population can facilitate identification of candidate genes for traits known to have been under strong artificial selection.

Indexed as

artificial selectionAtlantic salmoncandidate genescontinent of origindomestication selectionoutlier testspopulation structureSNP

Identifiers

PMID28250812
PMCPMC5322405
OpenAlexW2552674072

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.