Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28250766›Full record

ReviewGastroenterology research and practice2017

Novel Implications in Molecular Diagnosis of Lynch Syndrome.

Raffaella Liccardo, Marina De Rosa, Paola Izzo, Francesca Duraturo

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Gastroenterology research and practice, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Frontiers in oncology · 2021
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Diagnostics of Mutations in MMR/Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Raffaella LiccardoDepartment of Molecular Medicine and Medical Biotechnology, University of Naples "Federico II", 80131 Naples, Italy.
Marina De RosaDepartment of Molecular Medicine and Medical Biotechnology, University of Naples "Federico II", 80131 Naples, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-4752-5678
Paola IzzoDepartment of Molecular Medicine and Medical Biotechnology, University of Naples "Federico II", 80131 Naples, Italy; CEINGE Biotecnologie Avanzate, University of Naples "Federico II", 80131 Naples, Italy.
Francesca DuraturoDepartment of Molecular Medicine and Medical Biotechnology, University of Naples "Federico II", 80131 Naples, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-0787-6182
University of Naples Federico II · ITCeinge Biotecnologie Avanzate (Italy) · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

About 10% of total colorectal cancers are associated with known Mendelian inheritance, as Familial Adenomatous Polyposis (FAP) and Lynch syndrome (LS). In these cancer types the clinical manifestations of disease are due to mutations in high-risk alleles, with a penetrance at least of 70%. The LS is associated with germline mutations in the DNA mismatch repair (MMR) genes. However, the mutation detection analysis of these genes does not always provide informative results for genetic counseling of LS patients. Very often, the molecular analysis reveals the presence of variants of unknown significance (VUSs) whose interpretation is not easy and requires the combination of different analytical strategies to get a proper assessment of their pathogenicity. In some cases, these VUSs may make a more substantial overall contribution to cancer risk than the well-assessed severe Mendelian variants. Moreover, it could also be possible that the simultaneous presence of these genetic variants in several MMR genes that behave as low risk alleles might contribute in a cooperative manner to increase the risk of hereditary cancer. In this paper, through a review of the recent literature, we have speculated a novel inheritance model in the Lynch syndrome; this could pave the way toward new diagnostic perspectives.

Identifiers

PMID28250766
PMCPMC5303590
OpenAlexW2582278964

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.