Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28250724›Full record

ReviewPrzeglad menopauzalny = Menopause review2016

The influence of uterine artery embolisation on ovarian reserve, fertility, and pregnancy outcomes - a review of literature.

Piotr Czuczwar, Anna Stępniak, Wojciech Wrona, Sławomir Woźniak, Paweł Milart, Tomasz Paszkowski

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Przeglad menopauzalny = Menopause review, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Contemporary Management of Uterine Fibroids.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Piotr Czuczwar3 Department of Gynaecology, Medical University of Lublin, Lublin, Poland.
Anna Stępniak3 Department of Gynaecology, Medical University of Lublin, Lublin, Poland.
Wojciech Wrona3 Department of Gynaecology, Medical University of Lublin, Lublin, Poland.
Sławomir Woźniak3 Department of Gynaecology, Medical University of Lublin, Lublin, Poland.
Paweł Milart3 Department of Gynaecology, Medical University of Lublin, Lublin, Poland.
Tomasz Paszkowski3 Department of Gynaecology, Medical University of Lublin, Lublin, Poland.
Medical University of Lublin · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Uterine fibroids are considered to be the most frequent female benign tumours. Fibroids affect mainly women of reproductive age. The most frequently reported signs and symptoms of fibroids include disturbances of the menstrual cycle such as heavy bleeding and painful menstruation, pelvic masses associated with pelvic pain, urinary problems or constipation, as well as infertility and recurrent pregnancy loss. The mainstay of fibroid treatment is still surgery. However, many patients seek alternative treatment options for fibroids, to preserve their uterus and fertility. One of the most important alternative treatment options for fibroids is uterine artery embolisation (UAE). However, there are some concerns that UAE may negatively influence ovarian function and even result in premature menopause. Moreover, the use of UAE in patients with future reproductive plans is still controversial, due to the possible pregnancy complications. The purpose of this review is to summarise the current knowledge regarding the possible influence of UAE on fertility, pregnancy outcome, and ovarian reserve.

Indexed as

fertilityfibroidsovarian reserveuterine artery embolisation

Identifiers

PMID28250724
PMCPMC5327622
OpenAlexW2588174394

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.