Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28250534›Full record

SynthesisBulletin of the World Health Organization2017

Pre-exposure rabies prophylaxis: a systematic review.

Jocelyn A Kessels, Sergio Recuenco, Ana Maria Navarro-Vela, Raffy Deray, Marco Vigilato, Hildegund Ertl, David Durrheim, Helen Rees, Louis H Nel, Bernadette Abela-Ridder and 1 more

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 55 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
55citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

55 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Reemergence of Human Rabies in an Endemic Peruvian Amazon Region.The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Empowering Riverine Communities in the Amazon: Strategies for Preventing Rabies.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2024
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Jocelyn A KesselsSchool of Veterinary Science, University of Queensland Gatton Campus, Via Warrego Highway, Gatton, Queensland 4343, Australia .
Sergio RecuencoNational Centre for Public Health, Instituto Nacional de Salud, Lima, Peru .
Ana Maria Navarro-VelaDirectorate General of Strategic Interventions in Public Health, Ministry of Health, Lima, Peru .
Raffy DerayDiseases Prevention and Control Bureau, Department of Health, Manilla, Philippines .
Marco VigilatoVeterinary Public Health Unit, Pan American Health Organisation-World Health Organisation, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil .
Hildegund ErtlWistar Institute Vaccine Center, Philadelphia, United States of America (USA).
David DurrheimHunter Medical Research Institution, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, Australia .
Helen ReesWits Reproductive Health and HIV Institute, University of Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa .
Louis H NelDepartment of Microbiology and Plant Pathology, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa .
Bernadette Abela-RidderNeglected Zoonotic Diseases, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland .
Deborah BriggsCollege of Veterinary Medicine, Kansas State University, Manhattan, USA .

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo review the safety and immunogenicity of pre-exposure rabies prophylaxis (including accelerated schedules, co-administration with other vaccines and booster doses), its cost-effectiveness and recommendations for use, particularly in high-risk settings.

methodsWe searched the PubMed, Centre for Agriculture and Biosciences International, Cochrane Library and Web of Science databases for papers on pre-exposure rabies prophylaxis published between 2007 and 29 January 2016. We reviewed field data from pre-exposure prophylaxis campaigns in Peru and the Philippines.

findingsPre-exposure rabies prophylaxis was safe and immunogenic in children and adults, also when co-administered with routine childhood vaccinations and the Japanese encephalitis vaccine. The evidence available indicates that shorter regimens and regimens involving fewer doses are safe and immunogenic and that booster intervals could be extended up to 10 years. The few studies on cost suggest that, at current vaccine and delivery costs, pre-exposure prophylaxis campaigns would not be cost-effective in most situations. Although pre-exposure prophylaxis has been advocated for high-risk populations, only Peru and the Philippines have implemented appropriate national programmes. In the future, accelerated regimens and novel vaccines could simplify delivery and increase affordability.

conclusionPre-exposure rabies prophylaxis is safe and immunogenic and should be considered: (i) where access to postexposure prophylaxis is limited or delayed; (ii) where the risk of exposure is high and may go unrecognized; and (iii) where controlling rabies in the animal reservoir is difficult. Pre-exposure prophylaxis should not distract from canine vaccination efforts, provision of postexposure prophylaxis or education to increase rabies awareness in local communities.

Indexed as

Developing CountriesAge FactorsAnimalsBites and StingsChiropteraCost-Benefit AnalysisDogsHealth ServicesHumansImmunization ProgramsImmunization ScheduleModels, EconometricPeruPhilippinesRabies VaccinesRisk FactorsRabies Vaccines

Identifiers

PMID28250534
PMCPMC5328107

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.