Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28250445›Full record

ArticleNature materials2017

The microstructure and micromechanics of the tendon-bone insertion.

L Rossetti, L A Kuntz, E Kunold, J Schock, K W Müller, H Grabmayr, J Stolberg-Stolberg, F Pfeiffer, S A Sieber, R Burgkart and 1 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Nature materials, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 155 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
155citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
27.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

155 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 387 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. BiomimeticBioactive materials · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Microengineered Gradient Hydrogels for Mechanobiology.Advanced healthcare materials · 2026
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. The Role of Phagocytic Cells in the Achilles Tendon.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Article

95 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

L RossettiLehrstuhl für Zellbiophysik, Technische Universität München, D-85748 Garching, Germany.
L A KuntzLehrstuhl für Zellbiophysik, Technische Universität München, D-85748 Garching, Germany.
E KunoldCenter for Integrated Protein Science (CIPSM), Department of Chemistry, Technische Universität München, D-85747 Garching, Germany.
J SchockLehrstuhl für Biomedizinische Physik, Physik-Department &Institut für Medizintechnik, Technische Universität München, D-85748 Garching, Germany.
K W MüllerInstitute for Computational Mechanics, Technische Universität München, D-85748 Garching, Germany.
H GrabmayrLehrstuhl für Zellbiophysik, Technische Universität München, D-85748 Garching, Germany.
J Stolberg-StolbergKlinik für Orthopädie und Sportorthopädie, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, D-81675 München, Germany.
F PfeifferLehrstuhl für Biomedizinische Physik, Physik-Department &Institut für Medizintechnik, Technische Universität München, D-85748 Garching, Germany.
S A SieberCenter for Integrated Protein Science (CIPSM), Department of Chemistry, Technische Universität München, D-85747 Garching, Germany.
R BurgkartKlinik für Orthopädie und Sportorthopädie, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, D-81675 München, Germany.
A R BauschLehrstuhl für Zellbiophysik, Technische Universität München, D-85748 Garching, Germany.
Technical University of Munich · DECenter for Integrated Protein Science Munich · DEKlinikum rechts der Isar · DELudwig-Maximilians-Universität München · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The exceptional mechanical properties of the load-bearing connection of tendon to bone rely on an intricate interplay of its biomolecular composition, microstructure and micromechanics. Here we identify that the Achilles tendon-bone insertion is characterized by an interface region of ∼500 μm with a distinct fibre organization and biomolecular composition. Within this region, we identify a heterogeneous mechanical response by micromechanical testing coupled with multiscale confocal microscopy. This leads to localized strains that can be larger than the remotely applied strain. The subset of fibres that sustain the majority of loading in the interface area changes with the angle of force application. Proteomic analysis detects enrichment of 22 proteins in the interfacial region that are predominantly involved in cartilage and skeletal development as well as proteoglycan metabolism. The presented mechanisms mark a guideline for further biomimetic strategies to rationally design hard-soft interfaces.

Identifiers

PMID28250445
OpenAlexW2592099693

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.