Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28250104›Full record

ArticleJournal of the Royal Society, Interface2017

Daniel Wangpraseurt, Camilla Wentzel, Steven L Jacques, Michael Wagner, Michael Kühl

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the Royal Society, Interface, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 54 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Light management by algal aggregates in living photosynthetic hydrogels.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Frontiers in microbiology · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Daniel WangpraseurtMarine Biological Section, Department of Biology, University of Copenhagen, Strandpromenaden 5, Helsingør 3000, Denmark dw527@cam.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0003-4834-8981
Camilla WentzelMarine Biological Section, Department of Biology, University of Copenhagen, Strandpromenaden 5, Helsingør 3000, Denmark.
Steven L JacquesDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Oregon Health and Science University, 3303 SW Bond Avenue, Portland, OR 97239, USA.
Michael WagnerEngler-Bunte Institute, Chair of Water Chemistry and Water Technology, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Engler-Bunte-Ring 1, 76131 Karlsruhe, Germany.
Michael KühlMarine Biological Section, Department of Biology, University of Copenhagen, Strandpromenaden 5, Helsingør 3000, Denmark mkuhl@bio.ku.dk.ORCID 0000-0002-1792-4790
University of Copenhagen · DKKarlsruhe Institute of Technology · DEOregon Health & Science University · USUniversity of Technology Sydney · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Application of optical coherence tomography (OCT) for

Indexed as

Tomography, Optical CoherenceAnimalsAnthozoaChromatophoresbioimagingcoral tissuegreen fluorescent proteinmicrostructureoptical coherence tomography

Identifiers

PMID28250104
PMCPMC5378135
OpenAlexW2594545232

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.