Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28249831›Full record

ArticleJMIR human factors2017

Negotiating Tensions Between Theory and Design in the Development of Mailings for People Recovering From Acute Coronary Syndrome.

Holly O Witteman, Justin Presseau, Emily Nicholas Angl, Iffat Jokhio, J D Schwalm, Jeremy M Grimshaw, Beth Bosiak, Madhu K Natarajan, Noah M Ivers

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR human factors, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Cardiac Rehabilitation: Under-Utilized Globally.Current cardiology reports · 2021
    Review
  9. Behavioral and Physical Activity Interventions for HAND.Current topics in behavioral neurosciences · 2021
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Holly O WittemanDepartment of Family and Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Laval University, Quebec City, QC, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4192-0682
Justin PresseauClinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, ON, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2132-0703
Emily Nicholas AnglPatients Canada, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0214-8696
Iffat JokhioPivot Design Group Inc, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0780-9374
J D SchwalmDepartment of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Hamilton Health Sciences, Hamilton, ON, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2516-4952
Jeremy M GrimshawClinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, ON, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8015-8243
Beth BosiakWomen's College Research Institute, Institute for Health Systems Solutions and Virtual Care, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6856-879X
Madhu K NatarajanDepartment of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Hamilton Health Sciences, Hamilton, ON, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6372-1348
Noah M IversWomen's College Research Institute, Institute for Health Systems Solutions and Virtual Care, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2500-2435

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTaking all recommended secondary prevention cardiac medications and fully participating in a formal cardiac rehabilitation program significantly reduces mortality and morbidity in the year following a heart attack. However, many people who have had a heart attack stop taking some or all of their recommended medications prematurely and many do not complete a formal cardiac rehabilitation program.

objectiveThe objective of our study was to develop a user-centered, theory-based, scalable intervention of printed educational materials to encourage and support people who have had a heart attack to use recommended secondary prevention cardiac treatments.

methodsPrior to the design process, we conducted theory-based interviews and surveys with patients who had had a heart attack to identify key determinants of secondary prevention behaviors. Our interdisciplinary research team then partnered with a patient advisor and design firm to undertake an iterative, theory-informed, user-centered design process to operationalize techniques to address these determinants. User-centered design requires considering users' needs, goals, strengths, limitations, context, and intuitive processes; designing prototypes adapted to users accordingly; observing how potential users respond to the prototype; and using those data to refine the design. To accomplish these tasks, we conducted user research to develop personas (archetypes of potential users), developed a preliminary prototype using behavior change theory to map behavior change techniques to identified determinants of medication adherence, and conducted 2 design cycles, testing materials via think-aloud and semistructured interviews with a total of 11 users (10 patients who had experienced a heart attack and 1 caregiver). We recruited participants at a single cardiac clinic using purposive sampling informed by our personas. We recorded sessions with users and extracted key themes from transcripts. We held interdisciplinary team discussions to interpret findings in the context of relevant theory-based evidence and iteratively adapted the intervention accordingly.

resultsThrough our iterative development and testing, we identified 3 key tensions: (1) evidence from theory-based studies versus users' feelings, (2) informative versus persuasive communication, and (3) logistical constraints for the intervention versus users' desires or preferences. We addressed these by (1) identifying root causes for users' feelings and addressing those to better incorporate theory- and evidence-based features, (2) accepting that our intervention was ethically justified in being persuasive, and (3) making changes to the intervention where possible, such as attempting to match imagery in the materials to patients' self-images.

conclusionsTheory-informed interventions must be operationalized in ways that fit with user needs. Tensions between users' desires or preferences and health care system goals and constraints must be identified and addressed to the greatest extent possible. A cluster randomized controlled trial of the final intervention is currently underway.

Indexed as

codesignhealth behaviorhealth educationmedication adherencemyocardial infarctionsecondary preventionstentsuser-centered design

Identifiers

PMID28249831
PMCPMC5352859

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.