Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28249639›Full record

ArticlePsychological medicine2017

Baseline demographics, clinical features and predictors of conversion among 200 individuals in a longitudinal prospective psychosis-risk cohort.

G Brucato, M D Masucci, L Y Arndt, S Ben-David, T Colibazzi, C M Corcoran, A H Crumbley, F M Crump, K E Gill, D Kimhy and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychological medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Frontiers in psychiatry · 2024
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

G BrucatoThe Center of Prevention and Evaluation,New York State Psychiatric Institute,Columbia University Medical Center,New York, NY,USA.
M D MasucciThe Center of Prevention and Evaluation,New York State Psychiatric Institute,Columbia University Medical Center,New York, NY,USA.
L Y ArndtThe Center of Prevention and Evaluation,New York State Psychiatric Institute,Columbia University Medical Center,New York, NY,USA.
S Ben-DavidThe Center of Prevention and Evaluation,New York State Psychiatric Institute,Columbia University Medical Center,New York, NY,USA.
T ColibazziThe Center of Prevention and Evaluation,New York State Psychiatric Institute,Columbia University Medical Center,New York, NY,USA.
C M CorcoranThe Center of Prevention and Evaluation,New York State Psychiatric Institute,Columbia University Medical Center,New York, NY,USA.
A H CrumbleyCity University of New York,New York, NY,USA.
F M CrumpThe Center of Prevention and Evaluation,New York State Psychiatric Institute,Columbia University Medical Center,New York, NY,USA.
K E GillDepartment of Psychology,The Catholic University of America,Washington, DC,USA.
D KimhyThe Center of Prevention and Evaluation,New York State Psychiatric Institute,Columbia University Medical Center,New York, NY,USA.
A ListerThe Center of Prevention and Evaluation,New York State Psychiatric Institute,Columbia University Medical Center,New York, NY,USA.
S A SchobelF. Hoffman-LaRoche A.G.,Basel,Switzerland.
L H YangDepartment of Social and Behavioral Sciences,College of Global Public Health, New York University,New York, NY,USA.
J A LiebermanThe Center of Prevention and Evaluation,New York State Psychiatric Institute,Columbia University Medical Center,New York, NY,USA.
R R GirgisThe Center of Prevention and Evaluation,New York State Psychiatric Institute,Columbia University Medical Center,New York, NY,USA.

Funding

Clinical and Translational Science AwardUL1TR000040 · NCATS · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI GINSBERG, HENRY N · 2012 to 2015
$26.2M
The Conte Center for Schizophrenia ResearchP50MH086385 · NIMH · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI KAHN, PAMELA BUTLER · 2009 to 2013
$10.7M
CTSA: K12 COMPONENTKL2RR024157 · NCRR · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI GINSBERG, HENRY N · 2006 to 2011
$8.9M
Thought disorder and social cognition in clinical risk states for schizophreniaR01MH107558 · NIMH · NEW YORK STATE PSYCHIATRIC INSTITUTE DBA RESEARCH FOUNDATION FOR MENTAL HYGIENE, INC · PI CORCORAN, CHERYL MARY · 2016 to 2020
$3.3M
Longitudinal Imaging of Patients at Clinical Risk for Psychosis.R01MH093398 · NIMH · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI SMALL, SCOTT A · 2011 to 2015
$2.5M
Schizophrenia risk to onset: Neurobiology and preventionK23MH066279 · NIMH · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI CORCORAN, CHERYL MARY · 2004 to 2008
$884k
Olfaction in the Psychosis Prodrome: Behavioral and ERP MeasuresR21MH086125 · NIMH · NEW YORK STATE PSYCHIATRIC INSTITUTE DBA RESEARCH FOUNDATION FOR MENTAL HYGIENE, INC · PI BRUDER, GERARD E, CORCORAN, CHERYL MARY · 2009 to 2010
$440k
Multimodal MR Imaging of the Glutamate System in SchizophreniaK23MH106746 · NIMH · NEW YORK STATE PSYCHIATRIC INSTITUTE DBA RESEARCH FOUNDATION FOR MENTAL HYGIENE, INC · PI GIRGIS, RAGY RAMSIS · 2015 to 2016
$370k
NCRR NIH HHS KL2 RR024157NIMH NIH HHS K23 MH066279NIMH NIH HHS K23 MH106746NIMH NIH HHS P50 MH086385NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH093398NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH107558NIMH NIH HHS R21 MH086125
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDSM-5 proposes an Attenuated Psychosis Syndrome (APS) for further investigation, based upon the Attenuated Positive Symptom Syndrome (APSS) in the Structured Interview for Psychosis-Risk Syndromes (SIPS). SIPS Unusual Thought Content, Disorganized Communication and Total Disorganization scores predicted progression to psychosis in a 2015 NAPLS-2 Consortium report. We sought to independently replicate this in a large single-site high-risk cohort, and identify baseline demographic and clinical predictors beyond current APS/APSS criteria.

methodWe prospectively studied 200 participants meeting criteria for both the SIPS APSS and DSM-5 APS. SIPS scores, demographics, family history of psychosis, DSM Axis-I diagnoses, schizotypy, and social and role functioning were assessed at baseline, with follow-up every 3 months for 2 years.

resultsThe conversion rate was 30% (n = 60), or 37.7% excluding participants who were followed under 2 years. This rate was stable across time. Conversion time averaged 7.97 months for 60% who developed schizophrenia and 15.68 for other psychoses. Mean conversion age was 20.3 for males and 23.5 for females. Attenuated odd ideas and thought disorder appear to be the positive symptoms which best predict psychosis in a logistic regression. Total negative symptom score, Asian/Pacific Islander and Black/African-American race were also predictive. As no Axis-I diagnosis or schizotypy predicted conversion, the APS is supported as a distinct syndrome. In addition, cannabis use disorder did not increase risk of conversion to psychosis.

conclusionsNAPLS SIPS findings were replicated while controlling for clinical and demographic factors, strongly supporting the validity of the SIPS APSS and DSM-5 APS diagnosis.

Indexed as

Disease ProgressionProdromal SymptomsAdolescentAdultFemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesMalePrognosisPsychotic DisordersRiskSchizophreniaYoung AdultAttenuated psychosisclinical high-risk for psychosisfirst episode of psychosisprodromal psychosisschizotypy

Identifiers

PMID28249639
PMCPMC5893280

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.