ArticleScandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine2017
The difficult medical emergency call: A register-based study of predictors and outcomes.
Article in Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
26 citing papers in PubMed.
- Video-assisted versus telephone-only pediatric emergency calls: a predefined substudy of the cluster randomized CAM-VISION trial.Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine · 2026Trial
- "Stay Calm and Pick Up Signs to Understand the Cause": Registered Nurses Use Multiple Strategies for Handling Difficult Emergency Calls.Journal of nursing management · 2026Article
- Protocol for an observational prospective study on the use and impact of over-the-phone interpretation in 911 calls with language discordance.BMC public health · 2025Observational
- Difficult calls to emergency medical dispatch centres - a mixed method study.BMC emergency medicine · 2025Article
- Characteristics and mortality of patients categorised with non-specific symptoms when dialling the emergency medical number: a register-based cohort study.BMC emergency medicine · 2025Article
- Introducing an on-site Helicopter Emergency Medical Service (HEMS) physician at the Emergency Medical Communication Centre - implications for dispatch precision at a Norwegian HEMS base.Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine · 2025Article
- Factors affecting communication time in an emergency medical communication centers.Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine · 2025Observational
- Emergency call utilization over a 10-years period: an observational study in Region Zealand, Denmark, 2013-2022.Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine · 2024Observational
- Differences between the dispatch priority assessments of emergency medical dispatchers and emergency medical services: a prospective register-based study in Finland.Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine · 2023Article
- Diagnoses and mortality among prehospital emergency patients calling 112 with unclear problems: a population-based cohort study from Denmark.Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine · 2022Observational
- Characteristics of low acuity prehospital emergency patients with 48-h mortality, an observational cohort study.Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine · 2022Observational
- Rendezvous between ambulances and prehospital physicians in the Capital Region of Denmark: a descriptive study.Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine · 2022Article
- Emergency medical dispatchers' experiences of managing emergency calls: a qualitative interview study.BMJ open · 2022Article
- The "unclear problem" category: an analysis of its patient and dispatch characteristics and its trend over time.BMC emergency medicine · 2022Article
- The Role of a Physician-Staffed Helicopter in Emergency Care of Patients on Isolated Danish Islands.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- The lay descriptors of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in the Western Cape province, South Africa.Resuscitation plus · 2021Article
- The perspectives of Swedish registered nurses about managing difficult calls to emergency medical dispatch centres: a qualitative descriptive study.BMC nursing · 2021Article
- Which symptoms pose the highest risk in patients calling for an ambulance? A population-based cohort study from Denmark.Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine · 2021Article
- Medical dispatchers' perception of the interaction with the caller during emergency calls - a qualitative study.Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine · 2021Article
- Trends and Characteristics of Emergency Medical Services in Italy: A 5-Years Population-Based Registry Analysis.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPre-hospital emergency care requires proper categorization of emergency calls and assessment of emergency priority levels by the medical dispatchers. We investigated predictors for emergency call categorization as "unclear problem" in contrast to "symptom-specific" categories and the effect of categorization on mortality.
methodsRegister-based study in a 2-year period based on emergency call data from the emergency medical dispatch center in Copenhagen combined with nationwide register data. Logistic regression analysis (N = 78,040 individuals) was used for identification of predictors of emergency call categorization as "unclear problem". Poisson regression analysis (N = 97,293 calls) was used for examining the effect of categorization as "unclear problem" on mortality.
results"Unclear problem" was the registered category in 18% of calls. Significant predictors for "unclear problem" categorization were: age (odds ratio (OR) 1.34 for age group 76+ versus 18-30 years), ethnicity (OR 1.27 for non-Danish vs. Danish), day of week (OR 0.92 for weekend vs. weekday), and time of day (OR 0.79 for night vs. day). Emergency call categorization had no effect on mortality for emergency priority level A calls, incidence rate ratio (IRR) 0.99 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.90-1.09). For emergency priority level B calls, an association was observed, IRR 1.26 (95% CI 1.18-1.36). DISCUSSIONS: The results shed light on the complexity of emergency call handling, but also implicate a need for further improvement. Educational interventions at the dispatch centers may improve the call handling, but also the underlying supportive tools are modifiable. The higher mortality rate for patients with emergency priority level B calls with "unclear problem categorization" could imply lowering the threshold for dispatching a high level ambulance response when the call is considered unclear. On the other hand a "benefit of the doubt" approach could hinder the adequate response to other patients in need for an ambulance as there is an increasing demand and limited resources for ambulance services.
conclusionsAge, ethnicity, day of week and time of day were significant predictors of emergency call categorization as "unclear problem". "Unclear problem" categorization was not associated with mortality for emergency priority level A calls, but a higher mortality was observed for emergency priority level B calls.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.