Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28249561›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2017

Reactome pathway analysis: a high-performance in-memory approach.

Antonio Fabregat, Konstantinos Sidiropoulos, Guilherme Viteri, Oscar Forner, Pablo Marin-Garcia, Vicente Arnau, Peter D'Eustachio, Lincoln Stein, Henning Hermjakob

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 520 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
520citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
20.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

520 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 910 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

460 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 6 institutions in 5 countries.

Antonio FabregatEuropean Molecular Biology Laboratory, European Bioinformatics Institute (EMBL-EBI), Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton, UK.
Konstantinos SidiropoulosEuropean Molecular Biology Laboratory, European Bioinformatics Institute (EMBL-EBI), Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton, UK.
Guilherme ViteriEuropean Molecular Biology Laboratory, European Bioinformatics Institute (EMBL-EBI), Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton, UK.
Oscar FornerEuropean Molecular Biology Laboratory, European Bioinformatics Institute (EMBL-EBI), Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton, UK.
Pablo Marin-GarciaFundación Investigación INCLIVA, Universitat de València, Valencia, Spain.
Vicente ArnauEscuela Técnica Superior de Ingenierías, Universitat de València, Valencia, Spain.
Peter D'EustachioNYU Langone Medical Center, New York, USA.
Lincoln SteinOntario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, Canada.
Henning HermjakobEuropean Molecular Biology Laboratory, European Bioinformatics Institute (EMBL-EBI), Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton, UK. hhe@ebi.ac.uk.
European Bioinformatics Institute · GBUniversitat de València · ESBeijing Proteome Research Center · CNNYU Langone Health · USOpen Targets · GBUniversity of Toronto · CA

Funding

Reactome - CoreU41HG003751 · NHGRI · ONTARIO INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RESEARCH · PI STEIN, LINCOLN D. · 2012 to 2021
$14.5M
TRAININGU54GM114833 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI LINDSEY, MERRY L., PING, PEIPEI · 2014 to 2017
$13.8M
NHGRI NIH HHS U41 HG003751NIGMS NIH HHS U54 GM114833
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundReactome aims to provide bioinformatics tools for visualisation, interpretation and analysis of pathway knowledge to support basic research, genome analysis, modelling, systems biology and education. Pathway analysis methods have a broad range of applications in physiological and biomedical research; one of the main problems, from the analysis methods performance point of view, is the constantly increasing size of the data samples.

resultsHere, we present a new high-performance in-memory implementation of the well-established over-representation analysis method. To achieve the target, the over-representation analysis method is divided in four different steps and, for each of them, specific data structures are used to improve performance and minimise the memory footprint. The first step, finding out whether an identifier in the user's sample corresponds to an entity in Reactome, is addressed using a radix tree as a lookup table. The second step, modelling the proteins, chemicals, their orthologous in other species and their composition in complexes and sets, is addressed with a graph. The third and fourth steps, that aggregate the results and calculate the statistics, are solved with a double-linked tree.

conclusionThrough the use of highly optimised, in-memory data structures and algorithms, Reactome has achieved a stable, high performance pathway analysis service, enabling the analysis of genome-wide datasets within seconds, allowing interactive exploration and analysis of high throughput data. The proposed pathway analysis approach is available in the Reactome production web site either via the AnalysisService for programmatic access or the user submission interface integrated into the PathwayBrowser. Reactome is an open data and open source project and all of its source code, including the one described here, is available in the AnalysisTools repository in the Reactome GitHub ( https://github.com/reactome/ ).

Indexed as

Computational BiologySoftwareAlgorithmsDatabases, FactualHumansNucleic AcidsProteinsNucleic AcidsProteinsData structuresOver-representation analysisPathway analysis

Identifiers

PMID28249561
PMCPMC5333408
OpenAlexW2594844287

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.