Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28249094›Full record

Trial reportJAMA cardiology2017

Effect of Ischemic Postconditioning During Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Patients With ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Thomas Engstrøm, Henning Kelbæk, Steffen Helqvist, Dan Eik Høfsten, Lene Kløvgaard, Peter Clemmensen, Lene Holmvang, Erik Jørgensen, Frants Pedersen, Kari Saunamaki and 23 more

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · greenAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in JAMA cardiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 70 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
70citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
12.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01435408 naunknown statusnot on this map

A Randomised Comparison of the Clinical Outcome After Postconditioning or Deferred Stent Implantation Versus Conventional Treatment

TypeinterventionalSponsorRigshospitalet, DenmarkRan2011 to 2024Enrolled2,000ConditionsST Segment Elevation Myocardial InfarctionArmsConventional primary PCI, Ischemic postconditioning., Deferred stenting in primary PCI.
NCT03787745 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2019, after this paper: background citation

The Effect of Ischemic Postconditioning in Patients With STEMI Undergoing Primary PCI (DANAMI4-iPOST2)

TypeinterventionalSponsorRigshospitalet, DenmarkRan2019 to 2033Enrolled1,800ConditionsST Segment Elevation Myocardial InfarctionArmsIschemic postconditioning, Conventional
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

70 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 127 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance (SCMR) expert consensus for CMR imaging endpoints in clinical research: part I - analytical validation and clinical qualification.Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance · 2018
    Guideline
  4. Trial
  5. Clinical outcomes of no stenting in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction undergoing deferred primary percutaneous coronary intervention.EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2022
    Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Prognostic impact of cardiac dysfunctions in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.American heart journal plus : cardiology research and practice · 2025
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review

10 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

33 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Thomas EngstrømDepartment of Cardiology, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Henning KelbækDepartment of Cardiology, Roskilde Hospital, Roskilde, Denmark.
Steffen HelqvistDepartment of Cardiology, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Dan Eik HøfstenDepartment of Cardiology, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Lene KløvgaardDepartment of Cardiology, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Peter ClemmensenDepartment of Cardiology, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Lene HolmvangDepartment of Cardiology, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Erik JørgensenDepartment of Cardiology, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Frants PedersenDepartment of Cardiology, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Kari SaunamakiDepartment of Cardiology, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Jan RavkildeDepartment of Cardiology, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark.
Hans-Henrik TilstedDepartment of Cardiology, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Anton VilladsenDepartment of Cardiology, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark.
Jens AarøeDepartment of Cardiology, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark.
Svend Eggert JensenDepartment of Cardiology, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark.
Bent RaungaardDepartment of Cardiology, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark.
Hans E BøtkerDepartment of Cardiology, Skejby University Hospital, Skejby, Denmark.
Christian J TerkelsenDepartment of Cardiology, Skejby University Hospital, Skejby, Denmark.
Michael MaengDepartment of Cardiology, Skejby University Hospital, Skejby, Denmark.
Anne KaltoftDepartment of Cardiology, Skejby University Hospital, Skejby, Denmark.
Lars R KrusellDepartment of Cardiology, Skejby University Hospital, Skejby, Denmark.
Lisette O JensenDepartment of Cardiology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.
Karsten T VeienDepartment of Cardiology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.
Klaus Fuglsang KofoedDepartment of Cardiology, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Christian Torp-PedersenDepartment of Clinical Epidemiology, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark.
Kasper KyhlDepartment of Cardiology, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Lars Nepper-ChristensenDepartment of Cardiology, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Marek TreimanDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Niels VejlstrupDepartment of Cardiology, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Kiril AhtarovskiDepartment of Cardiology, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Jacob LønborgDepartment of Cardiology, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Lars KøberDepartment of Cardiology, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Third Danish Study of Optimal Acute Treatment of Patients With ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction–Ischemic Postconditioning (DANAMI-3–iPOST) Investigators
University of Copenhagen · DKRigshospitalet · DKAalborg University Hospital · DKAarhus University Hospital · DKOdense University Hospital · DKRoskilde Sygehus · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Ischemic postconditioning of the heart during primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) induced by repetitive interruptions of blood flow to the ischemic myocardial region immediately after reopening of the infarct-related artery may limit myocardial damage. Objective: To determine whether ischemic postconditioning can improve the clinical outcomes in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Design, Setting, And Participants: In this multicenter, randomized clinical trial, patients with onset of symptoms within 12 hours, STEMI, and thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) grade 0-1 flow in the infarct-related artery at arrival were randomized to conventional PCI or postconditioning. Inclusion began on March 21, 2011, through February 2, 2014, and follow-up was completed on February 2, 2016. Analysis was based on intention to treat. Interventions: Patients were randomly allocated 1:1 to conventional primary PCI, including stent implantation, or postconditioning performed as 4 repeated 30-second balloon occlusions followed by 30 seconds of reperfusion immediately after opening of the infarct-related artery and before stent implantation. Main Outcome and Measures: A combination of all-cause death and hospitalization for heart failure. Results: During the inclusion period, 1234 patients (975 men [79.0%] and 259 women [21.0%]; mean [SD] age, 62 [11] years) underwent randomization in the trial. Median follow-up was 38 months (interquartile range, 24-58 months). The primary outcome occurred in 69 patients (11.2%) who underwent conventional primary PCI and in 65 (10.5%) who underwent postconditioning (hazard ratio, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.66-1.30; P = .66). The hazard ratios were 0.75 (95% CI, 0.49-1.14; P = .18) for all-cause death and 0.99 (95% CI, 0.60-1.64; P = .96) for heart failure. Conclusions and Relevance: Routine ischemic postconditioning during primary PCI failed to reduce the composite outcome of death from any cause and hospitalization for heart failure in patients with STEMI and TIMI grade 0-1 flow at arrival. Trial Registration: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01435408.

Indexed as

Coronary VesselsMortalityMyocardiumAgedCause of DeathDenmarkFemaleHeart FailureHospitalizationHumansIschemic PostconditioningMaleMiddle AgedPercutaneous Coronary InterventionProportional Hazards ModelsST Elevation Myocardial Infarction

Identifiers

PMID28249094
PMCPMC5814983
OpenAlexW2591957544

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.