Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28249011›Full record

ArticlePloS one2017

Transposon insertion libraries for the characterization of mutants from the kiwifruit pathogen Pseudomonas syringae pv. actinidiae.

Carl H Mesarich, Jonathan Rees-George, Paul P Gardner, Fatemeh Ashari Ghomi, Monica L Gerth, Mark T Andersen, Erik H A Rikkerink, Peter C Fineran, Matthew D Templeton

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
6.1field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. An OmpW-dependent T4-like phage infectsMicrobial genomics · 2023
    Article
  4. International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Carl H MesarichBioprotection Portfolio, The New Zealand Institute for Plant & Food Research Limited, Auckland, New Zealand.
Jonathan Rees-GeorgeBioprotection Portfolio, The New Zealand Institute for Plant & Food Research Limited, Auckland, New Zealand.
Paul P GardnerBio-Protection Research Centre, New Zealand.
Fatemeh Ashari GhomiBio-Protection Research Centre, New Zealand.
Monica L GerthDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.
Mark T AndersenBioprotection Portfolio, The New Zealand Institute for Plant & Food Research Limited, Auckland, New Zealand.
Erik H A RikkerinkBioprotection Portfolio, The New Zealand Institute for Plant & Food Research Limited, Auckland, New Zealand.
Peter C FineranBio-Protection Research Centre, New Zealand.
Matthew D TempletonBioprotection Portfolio, The New Zealand Institute for Plant & Food Research Limited, Auckland, New Zealand.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0192-9041
Plant & Food Research · NZUniversity of Canterbury · NZUniversity of Otago · NZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pseudomonas syringae pv. actinidiae (Psa), the causal agent of kiwifruit canker, is one of the most devastating plant diseases of recent times. We have generated two mini-Tn5-based random insertion libraries of Psa ICMP 18884. The first, a 'phenotype of interest' (POI) library, consists of 10,368 independent mutants gridded into 96-well plates. By replica plating onto selective media, the POI library was successfully screened for auxotrophic and motility mutants. Lipopolysaccharide (LPS) biosynthesis mutants with 'Fuzzy-Spreader'-like morphologies were also identified through a visual screen. The second, a 'mutant of interest' (MOI) library, comprises around 96,000 independent mutants, also stored in 96-well plates, with approximately 200 individuals per well. The MOI library was sequenced on the Illumina MiSeq platform using Transposon-Directed Insertion site Sequencing (TraDIS) to map insertion sites onto the Psa genome. A grid-based PCR method was developed to recover individual mutants, and using this strategy, the MOI library was successfully screened for a putative LPS mutant not identified in the visual screen. The Psa chromosome and plasmid had 24,031 and 1,236 independent insertion events respectively, giving insertion frequencies of 3.65 and 16.6 per kb respectively. These data suggest that the MOI library is near saturation, with the theoretical probability of finding an insert in any one chromosomal gene estimated to be 97.5%. However, only 47% of chromosomal genes had insertions. This surprisingly low rate cannot be solely explained by the lack of insertions in essential genes, which would be expected to be around 5%. Strikingly, many accessory genes, including most of those encoding type III effectors, lacked insertions. In contrast, 94% of genes on the Psa plasmid had insertions, including for example, the type III effector HopAU1. These results suggest that some chromosomal sites are rendered inaccessible to transposon insertion, either by DNA-binding proteins or by the architecture of the nucleoid.

Indexed as

DNA Transposable ElementsINDEL MutationMutagenesis, InsertionalActinidiaFruitGene LibraryPlant DiseasesPseudomonas syringaeDNA Transposable Elements

Identifiers

PMID28249011
PMCPMC5332098
OpenAlexW2592410791

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.