Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28248624›Full record

Trial reportJournal of health communication2017

Communication Among Melanoma Family Members.

Deborah J Bowen, Terrance Albrecht, Jennifer Hay, Susan Eggly, Julie Harris-Wei, Hendrika Meischke, Wylie Burke

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of health communication, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Effectiveness of theCirculation · 2023
    Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Development of FamilyTalk: an Intervention to Support Communication and Educate Families About Colorectal Cancer Risk.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2020
    Article
  11. Observational
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Deborah J Bowena Department of Bioethics and Humanities , University of Washington , Seattle , Washington , USA.
Terrance Albrechtb Department of Communication and Behavioral Oncology , Karamos Cancer Institute, Wayne State University , Detroit , Michigan , USA.
Jennifer Hayc Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences , Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center , New York , New York , USA.
Susan Egglyb Department of Communication and Behavioral Oncology , Karamos Cancer Institute, Wayne State University , Detroit , Michigan , USA.
Julie Harris-Weid Institute for Public Health Genetics, University of California San Francisco , San Francisco , California , USA.
Hendrika Meischkee Department of Health Services , University of Washington , Seattle , Washington , USA.
Wylie Burkea Department of Bioethics and Humanities , University of Washington , Seattle , Washington , USA.
University of Washington · USThe Barbara Ann Karmanos Cancer Institute · USMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · USUniversity of California, San Francisco · US

Funding

Communication Intervention with Melanoma FamiliesR01CA107430 · NCI · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI BOWEN, DEBORAH J. · 2004 to 2007
$2.4M
Center for Transdisciplinary ELSI Research in Translational GenomicsP20HG007243 · NHGRI · KAISER FOUNDATION RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI HARRIS-WAI, JULIE NOEL, KOENIG, BARBARA A. · 2013 to 2016
$958k
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA107430NHGRI NIH HHS P20 HG007243
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Interventions to improve communication among family members may facilitate information flow about familial risk and preventive health behaviors. This is a secondary analysis of the effects of an interactive website intervention aimed at increasing communication frequency and agreement about health risk among melanoma families. Participants were family units, consisting of one family member with melanoma identified from a previous research study (the Case) and an additional first degree relative and a parent of a child 0-17. Family triads were randomized to receive access to the website intervention or to serve as control families. Family communication frequency and agreement about melanoma prevention behaviors and beliefs were measured at baseline and again at 1 year post randomization. Intervention participants of all three types significantly increased the frequency of communication to their first degree relatives (Parents, siblings, children; range = 14-18 percentage points; all p < .05). At baseline, approximately two-thirds of all three family members talked with at least some member of the family about cancer risk. Agreement between Cases and First Degree Relatives and between Cases and Parents increased from pre to post intervention in the intervention participants compared to the control participants (p < .05). These findings provide support for interventions to improve family communication about cancer risk.

Indexed as

CommunicationGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFamilyFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHealth PromotionHumansMaleMelanomaMiddle AgedSkin NeoplasmsYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID28248624
PMCPMC5592097
OpenAlexW2588994064

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.