Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28248279›Full record

ArticleProteomes2015

Proteomics Is Analytical Chemistry: Fitness-for-Purpose in the Application of Top-Down and Bottom-Up Analyses.

Jens R Coorssen, Alfred L Yergey

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proteomes, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Special Issue "Protein Analysis by Mass Spectrometry".Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Proteomics in Multiple Sclerosis: The Perspective of the Clinician.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jens R CoorssenMolecular Physiology and the Molecular Medicine Research Group, School of Medicine, Western Sydney University, Office 30.2.15, Campbelltown Campus, Locked Bag 1797, Penrith 2570, NSW, Australia. j.coorssen@westernsydney.edu.au.
Alfred L YergeyNational Institute of Child Health and Human Development, NIH, Building 10, Room 9D 52, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA. aly@helix.nih.gov.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Molecular mechanisms underlying health and disease function at least in part based on the flexibility and fine-tuning afforded by protein isoforms and post-translational modifications. The ability to effectively and consistently resolve these protein species or proteoforms, as well as assess quantitative changes is therefore central to proteomic analyses. Here we discuss the pros and cons of currently available and developing analytical techniques from the perspective of the full spectrum of available tools and their current applications, emphasizing the concept of fitness-for-purpose in experimental design based on consideration of sample size and complexity; this necessarily also addresses analytical reproducibility and its variance. Data quality is considered the primary criterion, and we thus emphasize that the standards of Analytical Chemistry must apply throughout any proteomic analysis.

Indexed as

2DEBottom-upDiscovery proteomicsLC/MS/MSprotein speciesproteoformsshotgunTop-downtwo-dimensional gel electrophoresis

Identifiers

PMID28248279
PMCPMC5217385

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.