Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28248180›Full record

ReviewEnvironmental health perspectives2017

Rethinking Environmental Protection: Meeting the Challenges of a Changing World.

Thomas A Burke, Wayne E Cascio, Daniel L Costa, Kacee Deener, Thomas D Fontaine, Florence A Fulk, Laura E Jackson, Wayne R Munns, Jennifer Orme-Zavaleta, Michael W Slimak and 1 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Environmental health perspectives, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Science Policy to Advance a Climate Change and Health Research Agenda in the United States.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Climate Silence on the Web Sites of US Health Departments.American journal of public health · 2020
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Impact of extreme weather events and climate change for health and social care systems.Environmental health : a global access science source · 2017
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Thomas A BurkeU.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, Washington, DC, USA.
Wayne E Cascio
Daniel L Costa
Kacee Deener
Thomas D Fontaine
Florence A Fulk
Laura E Jackson
Wayne R Munns
Jennifer Orme-Zavaleta
Michael W Slimak
Valerie G Zartarian

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

summaryFrom climate change to hydraulic fracturing, and from drinking water safety to wildfires, environmental challenges are changing. The United States has made substantial environmental protection progress based on media-specific and single pollutant risk-based frameworks. However, today’s environmental problems are increasingly complex and new scientific approaches and tools are needed to achieve sustainable solutions to protect the environment and public health. In this article, we present examples of today’s environmental challenges and offer an integrated systems approach to address them. We provide a strategic framework and recommendations for advancing the application of science for protecting the environment and public health. We posit that addressing 21st century challenges requires transdisciplinary and systems approaches, new data sources, and stakeholder partnerships. To address these challenges, we outline a process driven by problem formulation with the following steps:

Indexed as

Climate ChangeConservation of Natural ResourcesEnvironmental MonitoringEnvironmental Pollution

Identifiers

PMID28248180
PMCPMC5332174

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.