Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28247943›Full record

ArticleRisk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis2017

Quantitative Risk Assessment of Norovirus Transmission in Food Establishments: Evaluating the Impact of Intervention Strategies and Food Employee Behavior on the Risk Associated with Norovirus in Foods.

Steven Duret, Régis Pouillot, Wendy Fanaselle, Efstathia Papafragkou, Girvin Liggans, Laurie Williams, Jane M Van Doren

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. An Agent-Based Model for Pathogen Persistence and Cross-Contamination Dynamics in a Food Facility.Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis · 2019
    Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Steven DuretU.S. Food and Drug Administration, Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition, College Park, MD, USA.
Régis PouillotU.S. Food and Drug Administration, Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition, College Park, MD, USA.
Wendy FanaselleU.S. Food and Drug Administration, Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition, College Park, MD, USA.
Efstathia PapafragkouU.S. Food and Drug Administration, Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition, College Park, MD, USA.
Girvin LiggansU.S. Food and Drug Administration, Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition, College Park, MD, USA.
Laurie WilliamsU.S. Food and Drug Administration, Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition, College Park, MD, USA.
Jane M Van DorenU.S. Food and Drug Administration, Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition, College Park, MD, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We developed a quantitative risk assessment model using a discrete event framework to quantify and study the risk associated with norovirus transmission to consumers through food contaminated by infected food employees in a retail food setting. This study focused on the impact of ill food workers experiencing symptoms of diarrhea and vomiting and potential control measures for the transmission of norovirus to foods. The model examined the behavior of food employees regarding exclusion from work while ill and after symptom resolution and preventive measures limiting food contamination during preparation. The mean numbers of infected customers estimated for 21 scenarios were compared to the estimate for a baseline scenario representing current practices. Results show that prevention strategies examined could not prevent norovirus transmission to food when a symptomatic employee was present in the food establishment. Compliance with exclusion from work of symptomatic food employees is thus critical, with an estimated range of 75-226% of the baseline mean for full to no compliance, respectively. Results also suggest that efficient handwashing, handwashing frequency associated with gloving compliance, and elimination of contact between hands, faucets, and door handles in restrooms reduced the mean number of infected customers to 58%, 62%, and 75% of the baseline, respectively. This study provides quantitative data to evaluate the relative efficacy of policy and practices at retail to reduce norovirus illnesses and provides new insights into the interactions and interplay of prevention strategies and compliance in reducing transmission of foodborne norovirus.

Indexed as

Food ContaminationFood HandlingNorovirusAlgorithmsCaliciviridae InfectionsDisease OutbreaksFoodFoodborne DiseasesFood MicrobiologyGastroenteritisHumansModels, StatisticalOccupational ExposurePrevalenceRestaurantsRisk AssessmentDiscrete event modelmicrobial risk assessmentnorovirusretail food establishment

Identifiers

PMID28247943
PMCPMC6032842

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.