Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28247864›Full record

ReviewCellular and molecular gastroenterology and hepatology2015

The Barrett's Gland in Phenotype Space.

Stuart A C McDonald, Trevor A Graham, Danielle L Lavery, Nicholas A Wright, Marnix Jansen

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cellular and molecular gastroenterology and hepatology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Current concepts in tumour-derived organoids.British journal of cancer · 2020
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. The metaplastic mosaic of Barrett's oesophagus.Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology · 2018
    Review
  15. Evolution of Premalignant Disease.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in medicine · 2017
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Stuart A C McDonaldCentre for Tumour Biology, Barts Cancer Institute, Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom.
Trevor A GrahamCentre for Tumour Biology, Barts Cancer Institute, Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom.
Danielle L LaveryCentre for Tumour Biology, Barts Cancer Institute, Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom.
Nicholas A WrightCentre for Tumour Biology, Barts Cancer Institute, Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom.
Marnix JansenCentre for Tumour Biology, Barts Cancer Institute, Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom; Department of Pathology, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

Funding

Cancer Research UK 14895
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Barrett's esophagus is characterized by the erosive replacement of esophageal squamous epithelium by a range of metaplastic glandular phenotypes. These glandular phenotypes likely change over time, and their distribution varies along the Barrett's segment. Although much recent work has addressed Barrett's esophagus from the genomic viewpoint-its

Indexed as

Barrett’s EsophagusCCO, cytochrome c oxidaseMetaplasiaNeutral Drift

Identifiers

PMID28247864
PMCPMC5301147

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.