Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28247526›Full record

ArticleAddiction biology2018

Naltrexone ameliorates functional network abnormalities in alcohol-dependent individuals.

Laurel S Morris, Kwangyeol Baek, Roger Tait, Rebecca Elliott, Karen D Ersche, Remy Flechais, John McGonigle, Anna Murphy, Liam J Nestor, Csaba Orban and 15 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Addiction biology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Relapse in alcohol dependence is characterized by disrupted modular brain network organization.European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

25 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Laurel S MorrisDepartment of Psychology, University of Cambridge, UK.
Kwangyeol BaekDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, UK.
Roger TaitBehavioural and Clinical Neuroscience Institute, University of Cambridge, UK.
Rebecca ElliottNeuroscience and Psychiatry Unit, University of Manchester, UK.
Karen D ErscheBehavioural and Clinical Neuroscience Institute, University of Cambridge, UK.
Remy FlechaisCentre for Neuropsychopharmacology, Division of Brain Sciences, Imperial College London, UK.
John McGonigleCentre for Neuropsychopharmacology, Division of Brain Sciences, Imperial College London, UK.
Anna MurphyNeuroscience and Psychiatry Unit, University of Manchester, UK.
Liam J NestorBehavioural and Clinical Neuroscience Institute, University of Cambridge, UK.
Csaba OrbanCentre for Neuropsychopharmacology, Division of Brain Sciences, Imperial College London, UK.
Filippo PassettiBehavioural and Clinical Neuroscience Institute, University of Cambridge, UK.
Louise M PatersonCentre for Neuropsychopharmacology, Division of Brain Sciences, Imperial College London, UK.
Ilan RabinerImanova, Centre for Imaging Sciences, UK.
Laurence ReedCentre for Neuropsychopharmacology, Division of Brain Sciences, Imperial College London, UK.
Dana SmithDepartment of Psychology, University of Cambridge, UK.
John SucklingBehavioural and Clinical Neuroscience Institute, University of Cambridge, UK.
Eleanor M TaylorNeuroscience and Psychiatry Unit, University of Manchester, UK.
Edward T BullmoreBehavioural and Clinical Neuroscience Institute, University of Cambridge, UK.
Anne R Lingford-HughesCentre for Neuropsychopharmacology, Division of Brain Sciences, Imperial College London, UK.
Bill DeakinNeuroscience and Psychiatry Unit, University of Manchester, UK.
David J NuttCentre for Neuropsychopharmacology, Division of Brain Sciences, Imperial College London, UK.
Barbara J SahakianBehavioural and Clinical Neuroscience Institute, University of Cambridge, UK.
Trevor W RobbinsDepartment of Psychology, University of Cambridge, UK.
Valerie VoonBehavioural and Clinical Neuroscience Institute, University of Cambridge, UK.
ICCAM Consortium
Imperial College London · GBNeuroscience Institute · ITUniversity of Cambridge · GBMotac Neuroscience (United Kingdom) · GBUniversity of Manchester · GBLivaNova (United Kingdom) · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council G1000018Medical Research Council MR/P008747/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Naltrexone, an opioid receptor antagonist, is commonly used as a relapse prevention medication in alcohol and opiate addiction, but its efficacy and the mechanisms underpinning its clinical usefulness are not well characterized. In the current study, we examined the effects of 50-mg naltrexone compared with placebo on neural network changes associated with substance dependence in 21 alcohol and 36 poly-drug-dependent individuals compared with 36 healthy volunteers. Graph theoretic and network-based statistical analysis of resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data revealed that alcohol-dependent subjects had reduced functional connectivity of a dispersed network compared with both poly-drug-dependent and healthy subjects. Higher local efficiency was observed in both patient groups, indicating clustered and segregated network topology and information processing. Naltrexone normalized heightened local efficiency of the neural network in alcohol-dependent individuals, to the same levels as healthy volunteers. Naltrexone failed to have an effect on the local efficiency in abstinent poly-substance-dependent individuals. Across groups, local efficiency was associated with substance, but no alcohol exposure implicating local efficiency as a potential premorbid risk factor in alcohol use disorders that can be ameliorated by naltrexone. These findings suggest one possible mechanism for the clinical effects of naltrexone, namely, the amelioration of disrupted network topology.

Indexed as

AdultAlcohol DeterrentsAlcoholismBrainFemaleFunctional NeuroimagingHealthy VolunteersHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedNaltrexoneNeural PathwaysSubstance-Related DisordersYoung AdultAlcohol DeterrentsNaltrexoneAddictionalcoholcocainenaltrexoneopiatesubstance use

Identifiers

PMID28247526
PMCPMC5811832
OpenAlexW2611244269

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.