Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28247479›Full record

Trial reportHIV medicine2017

Does efavirenz replacement improve neurological function in treated HIV infection?

B Payne, T J Chadwick, A Blamire, K N Anderson, J Parikh, J Qian, A M Hynes, J Wilkinson, D A Price, Efficacy of Switch to Lopinavir/Ritonavir in Improving Cognitive Function in Efavirenz-treated Patients (SLICE) study team

Open access · hybridAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IVControlled Clinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in HIV medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. CNS Neurotoxicity of Antiretrovirals.Journal of neuroimmune pharmacology : the official journal of the Society on NeuroImmune Pharmacology · 2021
    Review
  7. Metabolomics of sleep disorders in HIV: a narrative review.Sleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung · 2020
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

B PayneDepartment of Infection and Tropical Medicine, The Newcastle Upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-3101-3512
T J ChadwickInstitute of Health and Society, Newcastle University, Newcastle, UK.
A BlamireCentre for In Vivo Imaging, Newcastle University, Newcastle, UK.
K N AndersonRegional Sleep Service, The Newcastle Upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle, UK.
J ParikhCentre for In Vivo Imaging, Newcastle University, Newcastle, UK.
J QianNewcastle Clinical Trials Unit, Newcastle University, Newcastle, UK.
A M HynesNewcastle Clinical Trials Unit, Newcastle University, Newcastle, UK.
J WilkinsonNewcastle Clinical Trials Unit, Newcastle University, Newcastle, UK.
D A PriceDepartment of Infection and Tropical Medicine, The Newcastle Upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle, UK.
Efficacy of Switch to Lopinavir/Ritonavir in Improving Cognitive Function in Efavirenz-treated Patients (SLICE) study team
Newcastle University · GBNewcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust · GB

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe contribution of specific antiretroviral drugs to cognitive function in HIV-infected people remains poorly understood. Efavirenz (EFV) may plausibly cause cognitive impairment. The objective of this study was therefore to determine whether chronic EFV therapy is a modifier of neurocognitive and neurometabolic function in the setting of suppressive highly active antiretroviral therapy.

methodsWe performed an open-label phase IV controlled trial. Adult subjects who were stable on suppressive EFV therapy for at least 6 months were switched to ritonavir-boosted lopinavir (LPV/r) with no change in the nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NRTI) backbone. The following parameters were assessed before and 10 weeks after therapy switch: cognitive function (by CogState

resultsSixteen subjects completed the study. Despite most subjects (81%) self-reporting memory problems at baseline, cognitive function, brain metabolites, and brain activity showed no change at 10 weeks after switch. Sleep quality improved on switch off EFV [mean PSQI (standard deviation): EFV, 8.5 (6.5); LPV/r, 5.8 (5.5); mean difference -0.4; 95% confidence interval -6.0 to -0.7].

conclusionsThis is the first study to assess the effects of chronic EFV therapy on neurological function in a controlled setting. We conclude that EFV withdrawal is unlikely to result in significant modification of neurocognitive function in otherwise stable HIV-infected people.

Indexed as

AdultAlkynesBenzoxazinesBrain ChemistryCognitionCyclopropanesDrug Therapy, CombinationFemaleHIV InfectionsHumansLopinavirMaleMiddle AgedNeuropsychological TestsProton Magnetic Resonance SpectroscopyRitonavirAlkynesBenzoxazinesCyclopropanesefavirenzLopinavirRitonavircognitive impairmentefavirenzfunctional magnetic resonance imagingHIVmagnetic resonance spectroscopy

Identifiers

PMID28247479
PMCPMC5600135
OpenAlexW2592767014

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.