ArticleMagnetic resonance in medicine2017
Assessing the effects of subject motion on T
Article in Magnetic resonance in medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Automatic Rejection based on Tissue Signal (ARTS) for motion-corrected quantification of cerebral venous oxygenation in neonates and older adults.Magnetic resonance imaging · 2024Article
- Volume-localized measurement of oxygen extraction fraction in the brain using MRI.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2019Article
- Characterization of MRI techniques to assess neonatal brain oxygenation and blood flow.NMR in biomedicine · 2019Article
- Exploring early human brain development with structural and physiological neuroimaging.NeuroImage · 2019Review
- Whole-slice mapping of GABA and GABANeuroImage · 2019Article
- Quantitative assessment of cerebral venous blood TMagnetic resonance in medicine · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeSubject motion may cause errors in estimates of blood T
methodsThe effects of integrated vNavs on TRUST-based T
resultsvNavs negligibly affected venous blood T
conclusionMotion during TRUST causes an overestimate of T
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.